← Florida

Tap water quality report

Lake Suzy Subdivision

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 33 contaminants and detected 10. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

33
contaminants tested
10
detected
2,670
people served
0
health-based violations
Water source
SWP
Ownership
Private
Counties served
DeSoto

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

0
health-based violations
24
violations on file
2
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MON Monitoring Resolved 2025-12-01 → 2025-12-31
MON Monitoring Resolved 2025-10-01 → 2025-10-31
MON Monitoring Resolved 2025-10-01 → 2025-10-31
MON Monitoring Resolved 2025-10-01 → 2025-10-31
Other Monitoring Unaddressed 2025-07-01
MON Monitoring Resolved 2023-09-01 → 2023-09-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2019-01-01 → 2019-03-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2019-01-01 → 2019-03-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2019-01-01 → 2019-03-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2019-01-01 → 2019-03-31

PFAS detected

PFAS are industrial “forever chemicals”. These are the EPA's latest nationwide test results (2023–2025).
ContaminantMaxDetection ratePeriod
Pfba 0.0107 µg/L 7/9 2025
PFBS 0.0069 µg/L 7/9 2025
Pfpea 0.0058 µg/L 7/9 2025
Pfhxa 0.0046 µg/L 4/9 2025
PFOA 0.0050 µg/L 4/9 2025
PFOS 0.0045 µg/L 4/9 2025
Pfhpa 0.0034 µg/L 2/9 2025

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
39.365 µg/L 66%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 49.1 µg/L
54/54 SYR4 2013–2019
TTHM
46.3 µg/L 58%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 52.9 µg/L
53/54 SYR4 2013–2019
Lead
0.0026 mg/L 17%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
12/12 LCR 2024
23 contaminants tested, none detected
11Cl-PF3OUdS4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaHfpo-DaNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpsPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaLithium

Utility contact

Contact
GREG HARRIS
Phone
863-491-7500

Frequently asked questions about Lake Suzy Subdivision

Is Lake Suzy Subdivision tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 10 contaminants in Lake Suzy Subdivision's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Lake Suzy Subdivision's water?

EPA monitoring detected Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), TTHM, Lead, Pfba, PFBS, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Lake Suzy Subdivision serve?

Lake Suzy Subdivision reports serving 2,670 people in Florida, per its EPA record.

Has Lake Suzy Subdivision had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 24 violations on file for Lake Suzy Subdivision, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 2 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.