Tap WaterIndex

← Florida

Tap water quality report

Royal Waterworks, Inc

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 100 contaminants and detected 18. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

100
contaminants tested
18
detected
4,481
people served
37
health-based violations
Florida rankingsLead in FloridaPFAS in Florida
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Private
Counties served
Broward

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

37
health-based violations
115
violations on file
3
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 2015-07-01 → 2015-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2015-07-01 → 2015-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2015-07-01 → 2015-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2015-07-01 → 2015-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2015-07-01 → 2015-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2014-10-01 → 2014-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2014-10-01 → 2014-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2014-07-01 → 2014-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2014-07-01 → 2014-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2014-07-01 → 2014-09-30

PFAS detected

PFAS are industrial “forever chemicals”. These are the EPA's latest nationwide test results (2023–2025).
ContaminantMaxDetection ratePeriod
PFBS 0.0055 µg/L 2/2 2024
Pfhxa 0.0041 µg/L 2/2 2024
PFHXS 0.0042 µg/L 2/2 2024
PFOA 0.0054 µg/L 2/2 2024
PFOS 0.0170 µg/L 2/2 2024
Pfpea 0.0063 µg/L 2/2 2024

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
TTHM
122.254 µg/L 153%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 135.1 µg/L
114/114 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
54.435 µg/L 91%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 70.9 µg/L
112/112 SYR4 2012–2019
Fluoride
500 µg/L 13%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 620 µg/L
33/33 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0054 mg/L 36%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
 17/17 LCR 2023
Nitrate
84 µg/L 0.8%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
 10/18 SYR4 2012–2019
Dalapon
1.67 µg/L 0.8%
of the EPA limit 200 µg/L
worst single sample: 1.7 µg/L
7/16 SYR4 2012–2019
Barium
10.585 µg/L 0.5%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 10.6 µg/L
4/4 SYR4 2012–2017
Copper
7.18 µg/L 0.6%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 7.9 µg/L
4/4 SYR4 2012–2017
Nitrite
24.15 µg/L 2.4%
of the EPA limit 1000 µg/L
worst single sample: 25 µg/L
2/9 SYR4 2012–2019
Arsenic
0.8000 µg/L 8%
of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
 1/4 SYR4 2012–2017
Cyanide
9.2 µg/L 4.6%
of the EPA limit 200 µg/L
 1/4 SYR4 2012–2017
Endothall
4.3 µg/L 4.3%
of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
 1/8 SYR4 2012–2017
82 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,3,7,8-TCDD2,4,5-TP2,4-D4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalAsbestosAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChromiumDichloromethaneDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDinosebDiquatEthylene DibromideEndrinEthylbenzeneGlyphosateHexachlorobenzeneHfpo-DaHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoLeadMercuryMethoxychlorNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaOxamylPfbaPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTotal Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB)ToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneLithiumO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
SHARON PURVIANCE
Phone
727-848-8292

Frequently asked questions about Royal Waterworks, Inc

Is Royal Waterworks, Inc tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 18 contaminants in Royal Waterworks, Inc's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Royal Waterworks, Inc's water?

EPA monitoring detected TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Fluoride, Lead, Nitrate, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Royal Waterworks, Inc serve?

Royal Waterworks, Inc reports serving 4,481 people in Florida, per its EPA record.

Has Royal Waterworks, Inc had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 115 violations on file for Royal Waterworks, Inc, of which 37 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 3 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.