← Florida

Tap water quality report

Sanford, City of (2 Wps)

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 99 contaminants and detected 14. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

99
contaminants tested
14
detected
79,715
people served
8
health-based violations
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Seminole

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

8
health-based violations
42
violations on file
1
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 2020-07-01 → 2020-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2020-07-01 → 2020-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2020-07-01 → 2020-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2020-07-01 → 2020-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2020-07-01 → 2020-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2017-10-01 → 2017-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2017-10-01 → 2017-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2017-10-01 → 2017-12-31
MR Monitoring Archived 2025-09-01 → 2025-09-30
MON Monitoring Archived 2025-09-01 → 2025-09-30

PFAS detected

PFAS are industrial “forever chemicals”. These are the EPA's latest nationwide test results (2023–2025).
ContaminantMaxDetection ratePeriod
PFHXS 0.0031 µg/L 2/4 2023
PFBS 0.0036 µg/L 1/4 2023
Pfhxa 0.0030 µg/L 1/4 2023
PFOS 0.0047 µg/L 1/4 2023
Pfpea 0.0049 µg/L 1/4 2023

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
TTHM
83.4175 µg/L 104%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 93.48 µg/L
112/114 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
24.821 µg/L 41%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 45.5 µg/L
112/115 SYR4 2012–2019
Nitrate
302.5 µg/L 3%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 320 µg/L
28/28 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.00080 mg/L 5.3%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
18/18 LCR 2023
Fluoride
714 µg/L 18%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 750 µg/L
7/7 SYR4 2014–2017
Arsenic
1.91 µg/L 19%
of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
worst single sample: 2 µg/L
4/40 SYR4 2012–2019
Barium
21.75 µg/L 1.1%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 23 µg/L
3/3 SYR4 2014–2017
Copper
8.225 µg/L 0.6%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 8.5 µg/L
2/4 SYR4 2014–2017
Combined Uranium
0.2980 µg/L 1%
of the EPA limit 30 µg/L
1/6 SYR4 2012–2014
85 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,4,5-TP2,4-D4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChromiumDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDinosebDiquatEthylene DibromideEndothallEndrinEthylbenzeneGlyphosateHexachlorobenzeneHfpo-DaHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoLeadMercuryMethoxychlorNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaNitriteOxamylPfbaPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTotal Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB)ToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneLithiumO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
RICHARD CASELLA
Phone
407-688-5119

Frequently asked questions about Sanford, City of (2 Wps)

Is Sanford, City of (2 Wps) tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 14 contaminants in Sanford, City of (2 Wps)'s water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Sanford, City of (2 Wps)'s water?

EPA monitoring detected TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Nitrate, Lead, Fluoride, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Sanford, City of (2 Wps) serve?

Sanford, City of (2 Wps) reports serving 79,715 people in Florida, per its EPA record.

Has Sanford, City of (2 Wps) had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 42 violations on file for Sanford, City of (2 Wps), of which 8 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 1 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.