← Florida

Tap water quality report

Ocud/Western Regional Wtr Sys (5 Wps)

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 98 contaminants and detected 12. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

98
contaminants tested
12
detected
206,742
people served
3
health-based violations
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Orange

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

3
health-based violations
17
violations on file
1
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Archived 1998-05-01 → 1998-05-31
MCL Health-based Archived 1994-08-01 → 1994-08-31
MCL Health-based Archived 1994-07-01 → 1994-07-31
MON Monitoring Archived 2025-04-01 → 2025-04-30
MON Monitoring Archived 2023-11-01 → 2023-11-30
MON Monitoring Resolved 2022-11-01 → 2022-11-30
MON Monitoring Resolved 2022-11-01 → 2022-11-30
MR Monitoring Unaddressed 2006-10-02
MR Monitoring Archived 1998-05-01 → 1998-05-31
MR Monitoring Archived 1998-03-01 → 1998-03-31

PFAS detected

PFAS are industrial “forever chemicals”. These are the EPA's latest nationwide test results (2023–2025).
ContaminantMaxDetection ratePeriod
PFOS 0.0050 µg/L 3/10 2024

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
TTHM
48.13 µg/L 60%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 66.86 µg/L
166/166 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
25.66 µg/L 43%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 43.16 µg/L
166/166 SYR4 2012–2019
Nitrate
18.7 µg/L 0.2%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 25 µg/L
64/64 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.00080 mg/L 5.3%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
17/17 LCR 2023
Fluoride
796 µg/L 20%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
16/16 SYR4 2014–2017
Di(2-ethylhexyl) Phthalate
0.7350 µg/L 12%
of the EPA limit 6 µg/L
worst single sample: 1 µg/L
11/19 SYR4 2014–2018
Dalapon
0.7524 µg/L 0.4%
of the EPA limit 200 µg/L
worst single sample: 1 µg/L
9/16 SYR4 2014–2017
Barium
18 µg/L 0.9%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
8/8 SYR4 2014–2017
Copper
412.5 µg/L 32%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 440 µg/L
6/8 SYR4 2014–2017
Lead
2 µg/L 13%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
3/8 SYR4 2014–2017
Arsenic
0.2000 µg/L 2%
of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
1/8 SYR4 2014–2017
86 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,4,5-TP2,4-D4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChromiumDichloromethaneDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDinosebDiquatEthylene DibromideEndothallEndrinEthylbenzeneGlyphosateHexachlorobenzeneHfpo-DaHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaNitriteOxamylPfbaPFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPfpeaPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTotal Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB)ToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneLithiumO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
CHRISTOPHE M. ROBERT
Phone
407-254-9830

Frequently asked questions about Ocud/Western Regional Wtr Sys (5 Wps)

Is Ocud/Western Regional Wtr Sys (5 Wps) tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 12 contaminants in Ocud/Western Regional Wtr Sys (5 Wps)'s water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Ocud/Western Regional Wtr Sys (5 Wps)'s water?

EPA monitoring detected TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Nitrate, Lead, Fluoride, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Ocud/Western Regional Wtr Sys (5 Wps) serve?

Ocud/Western Regional Wtr Sys (5 Wps) reports serving 206,742 people in Florida, per its EPA record.

Has Ocud/Western Regional Wtr Sys (5 Wps) had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 17 violations on file for Ocud/Western Regional Wtr Sys (5 Wps), of which 3 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 1 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.