Is Lake Utility Services Inc North (8 Wps) Tap Water Safe? Quality Report

Water source: Ground water
Ownership: Mixed public/private
Counties served: Lake

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

health-based violations

violations on file

still open

Violation	Type	Status	Period
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2021-10-01 → 2021-12-31
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2021-10-01 → 2021-12-31
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2021-10-01 → 2021-12-31
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2021-10-01 → 2021-12-31
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2021-10-01 → 2021-12-31
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2021-10-01 → 2021-12-31
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2021-10-01 → 2021-12-31
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2021-10-01 → 2021-12-31
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2021-07-01 → 2021-09-30
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2021-07-01 → 2021-09-30

PFAS detected

PFAS are industrial “forever chemicals”. These are the EPA's latest nationwide test results (2023–2025).

Contaminant	Max	Detection rate	Period
PFBS	0.0130 µg/L	12/14	2024
PFOS	0.0140 µg/L	12/14	2024
PFOA	0.0100 µg/L	6/14	2024
Pfpea	0.0057 µg/L	6/14	2024
PFHXS	0.0037 µg/L	5/14	2024
Pfhxa	0.0042 µg/L	3/14	2024

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.

Contaminant	Level vs EPA limit	Detection rate	Source	Period
TTHM	93.995 µg/L 117% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L worst single sample: 138 µg/L	142/142	SYR4	2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)	94.205 µg/L 157% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 60 µg/L worst single sample: 124 µg/L	140/142	SYR4	2012–2019
Nitrate	4230 µg/L 42% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L worst single sample: 4650 µg/L	126/132	SYR4	2012–2019
Barium	28.425 µg/L 1.4% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L worst single sample: 32.4 µg/L	16/16	SYR4	2014–2017
Copper	18.02 µg/L 1.4% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L worst single sample: 18.3 µg/L	15/16	SYR4	2014–2017
Lead	0.0010 mg/L 6.7% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L	15/15	LCR	2023
Xylenes, Total	45.82 µg/L 0.5% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L worst single sample: 76.4 µg/L	12/39	SYR4	2014–2019
Ethylbenzene	12.116 µg/L 1.7% of the EPA limit 700 µg/L worst single sample: 16.5 µg/L	9/32	SYR4	2014–2019
Chromium	1.5 µg/L 1.5% of the EPA limit 100 µg/L	7/16	SYR4	2014–2017
Selenium	6.15 µg/L 12% of the EPA limit 50 µg/L worst single sample: 6.3 µg/L	6/16	SYR4	2014–2017
Arsenic	6.16 µg/L 62% of the EPA limit 10 µg/L worst single sample: 6.3 µg/L	5/16	SYR4	2014–2017
Fluoride	210 µg/L 5.3% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L	4/32	SYR4	2014–2017
Cyanide	6.1 µg/L 3.1% of the EPA limit 200 µg/L	1/16	SYR4	2014–2017
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene	0.1260 µg/L 0.3% of the EPA limit 50 µg/L	1/36	SYR4	2014–2019
Lead	1.1 µg/L 7.3% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L	1/16	SYR4	2014–2017
Thallium, Total	2 µg/L 100% of the EPA limit 2 µg/L	1/16	SYR4	2014–2017

76 contaminants tested, none detected

1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,4,5-TP2,4-D4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDinosebDiquatEthylene DibromideEndothallEndrinGlyphosateHexachlorobenzeneHfpo-DaHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideLassoMercuryMethoxychlorNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaNitriteOxamylPfbaPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaPentachlorophenolPicloramSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneTolueneTotal Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB)ToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl Chloridecis-1,2-DichloroethyleneLithiumO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact: BRYAN GONGRE
Phone: 321-972-0360

Frequently asked questions about Lake Utility Services Inc North (8 Wps)

Is Lake Utility Services Inc North (8 Wps) tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 22 contaminants in Lake Utility Services Inc North (8 Wps)'s water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Lake Utility Services Inc North (8 Wps)'s water?

EPA monitoring detected TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Nitrate, Barium, Copper, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Lake Utility Services Inc North (8 Wps) serve?

Lake Utility Services Inc North (8 Wps) reports serving 24,798 people in Florida, per its EPA record.

Has Lake Utility Services Inc North (8 Wps) had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 98 violations on file for Lake Utility Services Inc North (8 Wps), of which 76 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.