← Florida

Tap water quality report

Eustis, City of (4 Wtps)

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 98 contaminants and detected 19. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

98
contaminants tested
19
detected
39,721
people served
4
health-based violations
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Lake

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

4
health-based violations
12
violations on file
1
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Archived 1994-10-01 → 1994-10-31
MCL Health-based Archived 1993-10-01 → 1993-10-31
MCL Health-based Archived 1993-08-01 → 1993-08-31
MCL Health-based Archived 1992-09-01 → 1992-09-30
MR Monitoring Unaddressed 2025-08-01
MR Monitoring Resolved 2018-01-01 → 2018-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2018-01-01 → 2018-12-31
MR Monitoring Archived 1995-06-01 → 1995-06-30
MR Monitoring Archived 1992-10-01 → 1992-10-31
MR Monitoring Archived 1992-10-01 → 1992-10-31

PFAS detected

PFAS are industrial “forever chemicals”. These are the EPA's latest nationwide test results (2023–2025).
ContaminantMaxDetection ratePeriod
PFBS 0.0120 µg/L 6/8 2023
PFHXS 0.0041 µg/L 5/8 2023
PFOS 0.0098 µg/L 5/8 2023
PFOA 0.0049 µg/L 2/8 2023

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Nitrate
3600 µg/L 36%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 3700 µg/L
56/76 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
28.825 µg/L 36%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 32.8 µg/L
32/32 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
12.18 µg/L 20%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 15.26 µg/L
31/32 SYR4 2012–2019
Fluoride
550 µg/L 14%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
19/19 SYR4 2014–2017
Lead
0.0 mg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
13/13 LCR 2023
Barium
177.2 µg/L 8.9%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 280 µg/L
9/9 SYR4 2014–2017
Copper
19.4 µg/L 1.5%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 21 µg/L
9/9 SYR4 2014–2017
Arsenic
3.32 µg/L 33%
of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
worst single sample: 3.6 µg/L
8/9 SYR4 2014–2017
Selenium
4.175 µg/L 8.4%
of the EPA limit 50 µg/L
worst single sample: 4.4 µg/L
6/9 SYR4 2014–2017
Chromium
4.2 µg/L 4.2%
of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
worst single sample: 4.6 µg/L
5/9 SYR4 2014–2017
Ethylbenzene
4.94 µg/L 0.7%
of the EPA limit 700 µg/L
worst single sample: 5.1 µg/L
5/26 SYR4 2012–2017
Lead
8.33 µg/L 56%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 9.2 µg/L
3/9 SYR4 2014–2017
Xylenes, Total
33.4 µg/L 0.3%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 34 µg/L
3/23 SYR4 2012–2017
Beryllium, Total
0.1000 µg/L 2.5%
of the EPA limit 4 µg/L
2/9 SYR4 2014–2017
Antimony, Total
2.1 µg/L 35%
of the EPA limit 6 µg/L
1/10 SYR4 2014–2017
79 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,4,5-TP2,4-D4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDinosebDiquatEthylene DibromideEndothallEndrinGlyphosateHexachlorobenzeneHfpo-DaHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaNitriteOxamylPfbaPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPfpeaPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaPentachlorophenolPicloramSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTotal Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB)ToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl Chloridecis-1,2-DichloroethyleneLithiumO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
GREG DOBBINS
Phone
352-357-5618

Frequently asked questions about Eustis, City of (4 Wtps)

Is Eustis, City of (4 Wtps) tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 19 contaminants in Eustis, City of (4 Wtps)'s water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Eustis, City of (4 Wtps)'s water?

EPA monitoring detected Nitrate, TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Fluoride, Lead, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Eustis, City of (4 Wtps) serve?

Eustis, City of (4 Wtps) reports serving 39,721 people in Florida, per its EPA record.

Has Eustis, City of (4 Wtps) had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 12 violations on file for Eustis, City of (4 Wtps), of which 4 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 1 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.