← Florida

Tap water quality report

Moore Creek Mount Carmel Utilities

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 98 contaminants and detected 21. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

98
contaminants tested
21
detected
4,875
people served
15
health-based violations
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Santa Rosa

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

15
health-based violations
39
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 2015-09-01 → 2015-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2015-09-01 → 2015-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2015-09-01 → 2015-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2015-07-01 → 2015-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2015-07-01 → 2015-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2015-07-01 → 2015-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2015-07-01 → 2015-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2015-05-01 → 2015-05-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2015-05-01 → 2015-05-31
MCL Health-based Archived 2006-09-01 → 2006-09-30

PFAS detected

PFAS are industrial “forever chemicals”. These are the EPA's latest nationwide test results (2023–2025).
ContaminantMaxDetection ratePeriod
PFHXS 0.0145 µg/L 2/6 2024
PFOS 0.0302 µg/L 2/6 2024

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Nitrate
6730 µg/L 67%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 7060 µg/L
78/94 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0017 mg/L 11%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
14/14 LCR 2024
Barium
137.5 µg/L 6.9%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 140 µg/L
6/6 SYR4 2014–2017
TTHM
10.602 µg/L 13%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 11.4 µg/L
5/7 SYR4 2014–2019
1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE
0.0346 µg/L 17%
of the EPA limit 0.2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 0.0370 µg/L
4/14 SYR4 2012–2017
Fluoride
330 µg/L 8.3%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
4/12 SYR4 2014–2017
Lead
1.04 µg/L 6.9%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 1.1 µg/L
4/6 SYR4 2014–2017
Mercury
0.4000 µg/L 20%
of the EPA limit 2 µg/L
3/6 SYR4 2014–2017
Copper
14.35 µg/L 1.1%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 15 µg/L
2/6 SYR4 2014–2017
Nitrite
20 µg/L 2%
of the EPA limit 1000 µg/L
2/47 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
1.3245 µg/L 2.2%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 1.35 µg/L
2/7 SYR4 2014–2019
Lithium
18.2 µg/L
No EPA limit set
2/6 UCMR-5 2024
Arsenic
0.5000 µg/L 5%
of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
1/6 SYR4 2014–2017
Beryllium, Total
0.2000 µg/L 5%
of the EPA limit 4 µg/L
1/6 SYR4 2014–2017
Cyanide
7.7 µg/L 3.9%
of the EPA limit 200 µg/L
1/6 SYR4 2014–2017
Di(2-ethylhexyl) Phthalate
1.1 µg/L 18%
of the EPA limit 6 µg/L
1/9 SYR4 2012–2017
Ethylene Dibromide
0.0150 µg/L 30%
of the EPA limit 0.0500 µg/L
1/13 SYR4 2012–2017
Selenium
1 µg/L 2%
of the EPA limit 50 µg/L
1/6 SYR4 2014–2017
trans-1,2-Dichloroethylene
0.2400 µg/L 0.2%
of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
1/6 SYR4 2014–2017
77 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,4,5-TP2,4-D4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneChlorobenzeneCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChromiumDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDinosebDiquatEndothallEndrinEthylbenzeneGlyphosateHexachlorobenzeneHfpo-DaHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMethoxychlorNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaOxamylPfbaPFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPfpeaPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaPentachlorophenolPicloramSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTotal Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB)ToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzene

Utility contact

Contact
ELIJAH BELL
Phone
850-675-6174

Frequently asked questions about Moore Creek Mount Carmel Utilities

Is Moore Creek Mount Carmel Utilities tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 21 contaminants in Moore Creek Mount Carmel Utilities's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Moore Creek Mount Carmel Utilities's water?

EPA monitoring detected Nitrate, Lead, Barium, TTHM, 1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Moore Creek Mount Carmel Utilities serve?

Moore Creek Mount Carmel Utilities reports serving 4,875 people in Florida, per its EPA record.

Has Moore Creek Mount Carmel Utilities had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 39 violations on file for Moore Creek Mount Carmel Utilities, of which 15 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.