← Florida

Tap water quality report

Nas Pensacola / Corry Station

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 99 contaminants and detected 23. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

99
contaminants tested
23
detected
22,600
people served
2
health-based violations
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Federal government
Counties served
Escambia

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

2
health-based violations
15
violations on file
1
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Archived 2008-06-01 → 2008-06-30
MCL Health-based Archived 2000-06-01 → 2000-06-30
Other Monitoring Unaddressed 2025-07-01
MR Monitoring Resolved 2020-07-01 → 2020-09-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2020-07-01 → 2020-09-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2014-05-01 → 2014-05-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2014-05-01 → 2014-05-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2014-05-01 → 2014-05-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2004-06-01 → 2004-06-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2004-06-01 → 2004-06-30

PFAS detected

PFAS are industrial “forever chemicals”. These are the EPA's latest nationwide test results (2023–2025).
ContaminantMaxDetection ratePeriod
Pfhxa 0.0039 µg/L 2/2 2025
PFHXS 0.0100 µg/L 2/2 2025
PFOS 0.0100 µg/L 2/2 2025
PFBS 0.0047 µg/L 1/2 2025
PFOA 0.0130 µg/L 1/2 2025
Pfpea 0.0031 µg/L 1/2 2025

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Nitrate
4300 µg/L 43%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 5000 µg/L
172/176 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
28.56 µg/L 36%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 29.5 µg/L
29/29 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
4.515 µg/L 7.5%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 5.75 µg/L
26/29 SYR4 2012–2019
Barium
51.95 µg/L 2.6%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 59 µg/L
22/22 SYR4 2014–2018
Lead
6.075 µg/L 41%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 15 µg/L
18/22 SYR4 2014–2018
Copper
8.375 µg/L 0.6%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 11 µg/L
16/22 SYR4 2014–2018
Lead
0.0028 mg/L 19%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
14/14 LCR 2023
Fluoride
820 µg/L 21%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
10/44 SYR4 2014–2018
Mercury
0.1000 µg/L 5%
of the EPA limit 2 µg/L
5/22 SYR4 2014–2018
Selenium
1.38 µg/L 2.8%
of the EPA limit 50 µg/L
worst single sample: 1.5 µg/L
5/22 SYR4 2014–2018
2,4-D
0.1630 µg/L 0.2%
of the EPA limit 70 µg/L
worst single sample: 0.1700 µg/L
3/55 SYR4 2012–2018
Arsenic
4.37 µg/L 44%
of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
worst single sample: 4.8 µg/L
3/22 SYR4 2014–2018
Cyanide
2.59 µg/L 1.3%
of the EPA limit 200 µg/L
worst single sample: 2.6 µg/L
3/22 SYR4 2014–2018
Heptachlor Epoxide
0.0183 µg/L 9.1%
of the EPA limit 0.2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 0.0200 µg/L
3/53 SYR4 2014–2018
Endrin
0.0022 µg/L 0.1%
of the EPA limit 2 µg/L
worst single sample: 0.0022 µg/L
2/52 SYR4 2014–2018
Chlordane
0.0130 µg/L 0.7%
of the EPA limit 2 µg/L
1/46 SYR4 2014–2018
Endothall
6.3 µg/L 6.3%
of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
1/45 SYR4 2014–2018
76 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,4,5-TP4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalAsbestosAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChromiumDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDinosebDiquatEthylene DibromideEthylbenzeneGlyphosateHexachlorobenzeneHfpo-DaHeptachlorHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMethoxychlorNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaNitriteOxamylPfbaPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaPentachlorophenolPicloramSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTotal Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB)ToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneLithiumO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
COMMANDER ANCELMO MCCARTHY
Phone
850-452-6336

Frequently asked questions about Nas Pensacola / Corry Station

Is Nas Pensacola / Corry Station tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 23 contaminants in Nas Pensacola / Corry Station's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Nas Pensacola / Corry Station's water?

EPA monitoring detected Nitrate, TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Barium, Lead, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Nas Pensacola / Corry Station serve?

Nas Pensacola / Corry Station reports serving 22,600 people in Florida, per its EPA record.

Has Nas Pensacola / Corry Station had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 15 violations on file for Nas Pensacola / Corry Station, of which 2 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 1 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.