Tap water quality report

Point Farm

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 51 contaminants and detected 15. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

51
contaminants tested
15
detected
270
people served
0
health-based violations
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Private
Counties served
Sussex

Compliance record

No violations on file. The EPA has no formal drinking-water violations recorded for this supplier.

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Copper
166 µg/L 13%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 292 µg/L
61/61 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane
17.152 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 19.8 µg/L
53/54 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
19.44 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 31.2 µg/L
53/54 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
49.45 µg/L 62%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 57.9 µg/L
51/52 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
9.5335 µg/L 16%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 13.7 µg/L
50/52 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
14.7675 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 20.9 µg/L
46/54 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
4.72 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 7.8 µg/L
45/52 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
4.805 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.9 µg/L
38/52 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromoform
6.619 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 8.85 µg/L
30/54 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
23.55 µg/L 157%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 43 µg/L
30/61 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
3.943 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.5 µg/L
27/52 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0018 mg/L 12%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
9/9 LCR 2025
Fluoride
69.54 µg/L 1.7%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 70.5 µg/L
2/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Xylenes, Total
1.642 µg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 1.65 µg/L
2/48 SYR4 2013–2019
Chromium
0.7000 µg/L 0.7%
of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
1/2 SYR4 2016–2019
36 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-DichloropropaneAntimony, TotalArsenicBariumBenzeneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCadmiumCarbon TetrachlorideCombined Radium (-226 And -228)DichloromethaneEthylene DibromideEthylbenzeneMercuryMonobromoacetic AcidMonochloroacetic AcidNitrateNitrate-NitriteNitriteSeleniumStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTrichloroethyleneVinyl Chloridecis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Frequently asked questions about Point Farm

Is Point Farm tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 15 contaminants in Point Farm's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Point Farm's water?

EPA monitoring detected Copper, Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Point Farm serve?

Point Farm reports serving 270 people, per its EPA record.

Has Point Farm had any water quality violations?

The EPA has no formal drinking-water violations on file for Point Farm.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.