Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2006-07-01 → 2006-07-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2006-07-01 → 2006-07-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2006-07-01 → 2006-07-31 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2002-07-01 → 2002-07-25 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Copper | 20.35 µg/L 1.6% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 22 µg/L | 16/17 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Lead | 0.00031 mg/L 2.1% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 11/11 | LCR | 2024 |
| Fluoride | 136.5 µg/L 3.4% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 140 µg/L | 8/8 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 1.375 µg/L 9.2% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 1.5 µg/L | 6/17 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 2.556 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.57 µg/L | 3/6 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 12.025 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 12.15 µg/L | 3/6 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 3.4975 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.575 µg/L | 3/3 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| TTHM | 15.117 µg/L 19% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 15.33 µg/L | 3/3 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 7.651 µg/L 13% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 7.69 µg/L | 3/3 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 4.38 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.4 µg/L | 3/3 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Chromium | 6.1 µg/L 6.1% of the EPA limit 100 µg/L | 1/1 | SYR4 | 2013 |
| Combined Radium (-226 And -228) | 0.1000 pCi/L 2% of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L | 1/1 | SYR4 | 2013 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 0.6100 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/6 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
39 contaminants tested, none detected
Frequently asked questions about Canterbury Crossing Pump District
Is Canterbury Crossing Pump District tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 13 contaminants in Canterbury Crossing Pump District's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Canterbury Crossing Pump District's water?
EPA monitoring detected Copper, Lead, Fluoride, Lead, Bromodichloromethane, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Canterbury Crossing Pump District serve?
Canterbury Crossing Pump District reports serving 471 people, per its EPA record.
Has Canterbury Crossing Pump District had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 4 violations on file for Canterbury Crossing Pump District, of which 3 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.