Tap WaterIndex

Tap water quality report

East Ncc District

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 81 contaminants and detected 17. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

81
contaminants tested
17
detected
5,538
people served
0
health-based violations
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Private
Counties served
New Castle

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

0
health-based violations
4
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
Other Monitoring Resolved 2002-07-01 → 2002-07-25
MR Monitoring Resolved 2001-07-01
MR Monitoring Resolved 2001-07-01
MR Monitoring Resolved 2001-07-01

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Copper
378.9 µg/L 29%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 1060 µg/L
115/116 SYR4 2012–2019
Fluoride
348.5 µg/L 8.7%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 360 µg/L
24/24 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0 mg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
 17/17 LCR 2025
Chloroform
2.1425 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.15 µg/L
16/26 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
10.5 µg/L 70%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 15 µg/L
16/121 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane
1.276 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.36 µg/L
15/26 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
3.855 µg/L 4.8%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 3.92 µg/L
14/14 SYR4 2013–2019
Chromium
7.15 µg/L 7.2%
of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
worst single sample: 7.5 µg/L
8/8 SYR4 2012–2015
Dibromochloromethane
0.8570 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 0.8900 µg/L
7/26 SYR4 2012–2019
Barium
78.925 µg/L 3.9%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 79.6 µg/L
6/8 SYR4 2012–2015
Nitrate
4019.1 µg/L 40%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
 6/48 SYR4 2012–2019
Nitrate-Nitrite
4017.19 µg/L 40%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 4019.1 µg/L
3/22 SYR4 2012–2019
Arsenic
0.5000 µg/L 5%
of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
 2/8 SYR4 2012–2015
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)
0.7075 pCi/L 14%
of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
worst single sample: 0.7100 pCi/L
2/3 SYR4 2013
Dichloroacetic Acid
2.085 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.14 µg/L
2/14 SYR4 2013–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
2.085 µg/L 3.5%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 2.14 µg/L
2/14 SYR4 2013–2019
Toluene
1.44 µg/L 0.1%
of the EPA limit 1000 µg/L
 1/26 SYR4 2012–2019
64 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalBenzeneBeryllium, TotalBromoformChlorobenzeneCadmiumCarbon TetrachlorideDichloromethaneDibromoacetic AcidEthylene DibromideEthylbenzeneHfpo-DaMercuryMonobromoacetic AcidMonochloroacetic AcidNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaNitritePfbaPFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpeaPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaSeleniumStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTrichloroacetic AcidTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneLithiumO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Frequently asked questions about East Ncc District

Is East Ncc District tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 17 contaminants in East Ncc District's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in East Ncc District's water?

EPA monitoring detected Copper, Fluoride, Lead, Chloroform, Lead, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does East Ncc District serve?

East Ncc District reports serving 5,538 people, per its EPA record.

Has East Ncc District had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 4 violations on file for East Ncc District, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.