Tap water quality report

Artesian Southern Sussex Regional

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 106 contaminants and detected 28. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

106
contaminants tested
28
detected
18,215
people served
5
health-based violations
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Private
Counties served
Sussex

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

5
health-based violations
7
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 2019-06-01 → 2019-08-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2019-06-01 → 2019-08-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2009-10-01 → 2009-10-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2009-10-01 → 2009-10-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2009-10-01 → 2009-10-31
Other Monitoring Resolved 2015-07-01
Other Monitoring Resolved 2015-07-01

PFAS detected

PFAS are industrial “forever chemicals”. These are the EPA's latest nationwide test results (2023–2025).
ContaminantMaxDetection ratePeriod
PFOS 0.0047 µg/L 2/6 2023

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Fluoride
1068 µg/L 27%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 1800 µg/L
173/176 SYR4 2012–2019
Copper
958.1 µg/L 74%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 1910 µg/L
170/171 SYR4 2012–2018
Chloroform
70.76 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 151 µg/L
138/140 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane
24 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 30.1 µg/L
137/140 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
10.1 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 13.3 µg/L
133/140 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
94.92 µg/L 119%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 231 µg/L
125/127 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
41 µg/L 68%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 100.4 µg/L
118/124 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
29 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 67.6 µg/L
117/124 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
21.1 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 32.8 µg/L
110/124 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
9.75 µg/L 65%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 18.5 µg/L
76/171 SYR4 2012–2018
Dibromoacetic Acid
2.2235 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.66 µg/L
52/124 SYR4 2012–2019
Barium
29.44 µg/L 1.5%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 30.4 µg/L
17/17 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0020 mg/L 13%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
14/14 LCR 2025
Di(2-ethylhexyl) Phthalate
1.61465 µg/L 27%
of the EPA limit 6 µg/L
worst single sample: 2.48 µg/L
10/31 SYR4 2012–2019
Nitrate
180 µg/L 1.8%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
8/38 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromoform
1 µg/L
No EPA limit set
7/140 SYR4 2012–2019
Di(2-ethylhexyl) Adipate
0.0810 µg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 400 µg/L
6/31 SYR4 2012–2019
Nitrate-Nitrite
167.7 µg/L 1.7%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 180 µg/L
4/19 SYR4 2012–2019
Arsenic
2.141 µg/L 21%
of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
worst single sample: 2.3 µg/L
3/17 SYR4 2012–2019
Chromium
1.18 µg/L 1.2%
of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
worst single sample: 1.2 µg/L
3/17 SYR4 2012–2019
Selenium
2.43 µg/L 4.9%
of the EPA limit 50 µg/L
worst single sample: 2.5 µg/L
3/17 SYR4 2012–2019
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)
1.815 pCi/L 36%
of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
worst single sample: 1.9 pCi/L
2/2 SYR4 2015
Dalapon
0.3408 µg/L 0.2%
of the EPA limit 200 µg/L
worst single sample: 0.3440 µg/L
2/24 SYR4 2012–2019
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
0.0360 µg/L 0.1%
of the EPA limit 50 µg/L
worst single sample: 0.0370 µg/L
2/42 SYR4 2012–2019
Monochloroacetic Acid
30.1 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 30.7 µg/L
2/124 SYR4 2012–2019
2,4-D
0.1070 µg/L 0.2%
of the EPA limit 70 µg/L
1/24 SYR4 2012–2019
Carbon Tetrachloride
1.07 µg/L 21%
of the EPA limit 5 µg/L
1/20 SYR4 2012–2019
78 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,4,5-TP4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranChlordaneDichloromethaneDinosebEthylene DibromideEndrinEthylbenzeneHexachlorobenzeneHfpo-DaHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideLassoMercuryMethoxychlorMonobromoacetic AcidNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaNitriteOxamylPfbaPFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPfpeaPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaPentachlorophenolPicloramSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTotal Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB)ToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneLithiumO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Frequently asked questions about Artesian Southern Sussex Regional

Is Artesian Southern Sussex Regional tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 28 contaminants in Artesian Southern Sussex Regional's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Artesian Southern Sussex Regional's water?

EPA monitoring detected Fluoride, Copper, Chloroform, Bromodichloromethane, Dibromochloromethane, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Artesian Southern Sussex Regional serve?

Artesian Southern Sussex Regional reports serving 18,215 people, per its EPA record.

Has Artesian Southern Sussex Regional had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 7 violations on file for Artesian Southern Sussex Regional, of which 5 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.