Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2015-07-01 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2015-07-01 |
PFAS detected
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nitrate | 6750 µg/L 68% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 8720 µg/L | 48/50 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Copper | 245.6 µg/L 19% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 318 µg/L | 39/41 | SYR4 | 2013–2018 |
| Chloroform | 5.3 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 12.1 µg/L | 18/19 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Nitrate-Nitrite | 4530 µg/L 45% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 6270 µg/L | 16/17 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Barium | 72.24 µg/L 3.6% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 72.8 µg/L | 15/15 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0 mg/L 0% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 10/10 | LCR | 2024 |
| TTHM | 13.5 µg/L 17% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 17.7 µg/L | 9/9 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 3.22 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.7 µg/L | 7/19 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 1.675 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.9 µg/L | 6/19 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Combined Radium (-226 And -228) | 1.17 pCi/L 23% of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
worst single sample: 1.2 pCi/L | 4/5 | SYR4 | 2013–2016 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 4.0685 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.1 µg/L | 4/9 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 6.888 µg/L 11% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 7.2 µg/L | 4/9 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chromium | 2.27 µg/L 2.3% of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
worst single sample: 2.3 µg/L | 3/15 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 1.383 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.4 µg/L | 3/9 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Fluoride | 694.5 µg/L 17% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 720 µg/L | 2/16 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 2.045 µg/L 14% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 2.1 µg/L | 2/41 | SYR4 | 2013–2018 |
| Di(2-ethylhexyl) Adipate | 0.0440 µg/L 0% of the EPA limit 400 µg/L | 1/15 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Di(2-ethylhexyl) Phthalate | 0.1000 µg/L 1.7% of the EPA limit 6 µg/L | 1/15 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 1.7 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/9 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Tetrachloroethylene | 0.5600 µg/L 11% of the EPA limit 5 µg/L | 1/15 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
82 contaminants tested, none detected
Frequently asked questions about Artesian Northern Sussex Regional
Is Artesian Northern Sussex Regional tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 24 contaminants in Artesian Northern Sussex Regional's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Artesian Northern Sussex Regional's water?
EPA monitoring detected Nitrate, Copper, Chloroform, Nitrate-Nitrite, Barium, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Artesian Northern Sussex Regional serve?
Artesian Northern Sussex Regional reports serving 5,511 people, per its EPA record.
Has Artesian Northern Sussex Regional had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 2 violations on file for Artesian Northern Sussex Regional, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.