← Connecticut

Tap water quality report

Watertown Fire District

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 111 contaminants and detected 18. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

111
contaminants tested
18
detected
6,718
people served
4
health-based violations
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Litchfield

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

4
health-based violations
172
violations on file
3
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 2008-09-01 → 2008-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2008-09-01 → 2008-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2008-09-01 → 2008-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2008-09-01 → 2008-09-30
MR Monitoring Unaddressed 2023-08-22
MR Monitoring Unaddressed 2023-08-22
MR Monitoring Unaddressed 2023-08-22
Other Monitoring Resolved 2023-08-10
Other Monitoring Resolved 2023-08-10
Other Monitoring Resolved 2023-07-01

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Copper
1065.8 µg/L 82%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 3200 µg/L
95/95 SYR4 2013–2019
Lead
14.715 µg/L 98%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 63.5901 µg/L
64/95 SYR4 2013–2019
Dibromochloromethane
2.82 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.95 µg/L
29/36 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane
3.93 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.2 µg/L
28/36 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
7.7795 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 11 µg/L
28/36 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
3.5715 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 6 µg/L
28/28 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
14.285 µg/L 18%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 17 µg/L
28/28 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
6.3365 µg/L 11%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 9 µg/L
28/28 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
1.17 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.2 µg/L
27/28 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
1.7266 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.1 µg/L
22/28 SYR4 2012–2019
Nitrate
673.8 µg/L 6.7%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
20/20 SYR4 2012–2019
Barium
30.45 µg/L 1.5%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 31 µg/L
12/12 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0022 mg/L 15%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
12/12 LCR 2026
Nitrate-Nitrite
595.65 µg/L 6%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 673.8 µg/L
11/11 SYR4 2012–2019
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)
1.336 pCi/L 27%
of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
worst single sample: 1.39 pCi/L
4/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromoform
0.8185 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 0.8300 µg/L
2/36 SYR4 2012–2019
Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U
0.6340 pCi/L 4.2%
of the EPA limit 15 pCi/L
1/6 SYR4 2012–2019
Monochloroacetic Acid
1.2 µg/L
No EPA limit set
1/28 SYR4 2012–2019
93 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,4,5-TP2,4-D4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalArsenicAsbestosAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChromiumCombined UraniumDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDinosebDiquatEthylene DibromideEndrinEthylbenzeneFluorideGlyphosateHexachlorobenzeneHfpo-DaHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorMonobromoacetic AcidNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaNitriteOxamylPfbaPFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpeaPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTotal Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB)ToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneLithiumO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
TANUIS, VINCENT
Phone
860-274-6332
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Watertown Fire District

Is Watertown Fire District tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 18 contaminants in Watertown Fire District's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Watertown Fire District's water?

EPA monitoring detected Copper, Lead, Dibromochloromethane, Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Watertown Fire District serve?

Watertown Fire District reports serving 6,718 people in Connecticut, per its EPA record.

Has Watertown Fire District had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 172 violations on file for Watertown Fire District, of which 4 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 3 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.