← Connecticut

Tap water quality report

Aquarion-Ridgefield

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 109 contaminants and detected 29. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

109
contaminants tested
29
detected
7,476
people served
7
health-based violations
Water source
SWP
Ownership
Private
Counties served
Fairfield

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

7
health-based violations
79
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
TT Health-based Resolved 1992-01-01
TT Health-based Resolved 1992-01-01
TT Health-based Resolved 1992-01-01
TT Health-based Resolved 1992-01-01
TT Health-based Resolved 1992-01-01
TT Health-based Archived 1992-01-01 → 2001-05-23
TT Health-based Archived 1992-01-01 → 2001-05-23
MR Monitoring Resolved 2021-12-30
Other Monitoring Resolved 2021-01-21
Other Monitoring Resolved 2021-01-21

PFAS detected

PFAS are industrial “forever chemicals”. These are the EPA's latest nationwide test results (2023–2025).
ContaminantMaxDetection ratePeriod
PFOA 0.0106 µg/L 9/10 2025
Pfhxa 0.0096 µg/L 6/10 2025
Pfpea 0.0106 µg/L 4/10 2025
PFBS 0.0033 µg/L 2/10 2025
PFOS 0.0061 µg/L 2/10 2025
Pfba 0.0053 µg/L 1/10 2025
Pfhpa 0.0054 µg/L 1/10 2025

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Copper
1152 µg/L 89%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 1530 µg/L
129/132 SYR4 2014–2019
Dibromochloromethane
7.4 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 14 µg/L
93/104 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane
13 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 16 µg/L
90/104 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
48.65 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 70 µg/L
84/104 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
59.3 µg/L 74%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 77 µg/L
78/78 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
18 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 20 µg/L
71/78 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
42 µg/L 70%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 46 µg/L
71/78 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
24 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 26 µg/L
71/78 SYR4 2012–2019
Nitrate
3110 µg/L 31%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 3290 µg/L
56/56 SYR4 2012–2019
Monochloroacetic Acid
2 µg/L
No EPA limit set
55/78 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
18 µg/L 120%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 65 µg/L
37/132 SYR4 2014–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
2.5 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5 µg/L
36/78 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromoform
8.4 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 21 µg/L
34/104 SYR4 2012–2019
Nitrate-Nitrite
3085.5 µg/L 31%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 3290 µg/L
28/28 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0031 mg/L 21%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
20/20 LCR 2025
Barium
58.3 µg/L 2.9%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 59 µg/L
8/8 SYR4 2014–2017
Fluoride
83 µg/L 2.1%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 90 µg/L
8/8 SYR4 2014–2017
Chromium
1.9 µg/L 1.9%
of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
worst single sample: 2 µg/L
3/8 SYR4 2014–2017
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)
2.89 pCi/L 58%
of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
worst single sample: 2.9 pCi/L
2/3 SYR4 2016–2019
Combined Uranium
5.43 µg/L 18%
of the EPA limit 30 µg/L
worst single sample: 5.6 µg/L
2/3 SYR4 2016–2019
Monobromoacetic Acid
1 µg/L
No EPA limit set
1/78 SYR4 2012–2019
Lithium
9.17 µg/L
No EPA limit set
1/10 UCMR-5 2024
80 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,4,5-TP2,4-D4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalArsenicAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDinosebDiquatEthylene DibromideEndrinEthylbenzeneGlyphosateGross Alpha, Excl. Radon And UHexachlorobenzeneHfpo-DaHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaNitriteOxamylPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpsPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTotal Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB)ToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl Chloridecis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
ULRICH, ROBERT J.
Phone
203-926-4320
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Aquarion-Ridgefield

Is Aquarion-Ridgefield tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 29 contaminants in Aquarion-Ridgefield's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Aquarion-Ridgefield's water?

EPA monitoring detected Copper, Dibromochloromethane, Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, TTHM, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Aquarion-Ridgefield serve?

Aquarion-Ridgefield reports serving 7,476 people in Connecticut, per its EPA record.

Has Aquarion-Ridgefield had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 79 violations on file for Aquarion-Ridgefield, of which 7 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.