← Connecticut

Tap water quality report

Aquarion-New Milford Regional

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 110 contaminants and detected 25. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

110
contaminants tested
25
detected
13,331
people served
8
health-based violations
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Private
Counties served
Fairfield, Litchfield

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

8
health-based violations
210
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 2002-08-01 → 2002-08-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2002-08-01 → 2002-08-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2002-08-01 → 2002-08-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2002-08-01 → 2002-08-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 1992-09-01 → 1992-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 1992-09-01 → 1992-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 1992-09-01 → 1992-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 1992-09-01 → 1992-09-30
MR Monitoring Archived 2023-01-01 → 2025-12-31
MR Monitoring Archived 2023-01-01 → 2025-12-31

PFAS detected

PFAS are industrial “forever chemicals”. These are the EPA's latest nationwide test results (2023–2025).
ContaminantMaxDetection ratePeriod
PFBS 0.0055 µg/L 5/10 2024
PFOA 0.0053 µg/L 5/10 2024
Pfhxa 0.0058 µg/L 4/10 2024
Pfpea 0.0067 µg/L 4/10 2024
PFOS 0.0053 µg/L 2/10 2024

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Copper
648 µg/L 50%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 820 µg/L
189/193 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
6 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 7 µg/L
58/82 SYR4 2012–2019
Nitrate
3983 µg/L 40%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 4085 µg/L
52/52 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane
9.7 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 13 µg/L
47/82 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
19.4 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 27 µg/L
37/82 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
3 µg/L 20%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
28/193 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0020 mg/L 13%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
26/26 LCR 2025
Nitrate-Nitrite
3907.25 µg/L 39%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 4085 µg/L
26/26 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromoform
1.1 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.3 µg/L
21/82 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
38.2 µg/L 48%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 43 µg/L
17/18 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
4.25 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5 µg/L
16/18 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
3 µg/L
No EPA limit set
16/18 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
8.6 µg/L 14%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 10 µg/L
15/18 SYR4 2012–2019
Combined Uranium
2.505 µg/L 8.4%
of the EPA limit 30 µg/L
worst single sample: 3 µg/L
12/15 SYR4 2013–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
1.66 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.1 µg/L
9/18 SYR4 2012–2019
Barium
71.85 µg/L 3.6%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 75 µg/L
8/8 SYR4 2014–2019
Fluoride
50 µg/L 1.3%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
8/8 SYR4 2014–2019
Chromium
1 µg/L 1%
of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
5/8 SYR4 2014–2019
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)
1.78 pCi/L 36%
of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
worst single sample: 1.8 pCi/L
2/15 SYR4 2013–2019
Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U
3.08 pCi/L 21%
of the EPA limit 15 pCi/L
worst single sample: 3.1 pCi/L
2/15 SYR4 2013–2019
85 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,4,5-TP2,4-D4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalArsenicAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDinosebDiquatEthylene DibromideEndrinEthylbenzeneGlyphosateGross Beta Particle ActivityHexachlorobenzeneHfpo-DaHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorMonobromoacetic AcidMonochloroacetic AcidNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaNitriteOxamylPfbaPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTotal Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB)ToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl Chloridecis-1,2-DichloroethyleneLithiumO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
ULRICH, ROBERT J.
Phone
203-926-4320
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Aquarion-New Milford Regional

Is Aquarion-New Milford Regional tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 25 contaminants in Aquarion-New Milford Regional's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Aquarion-New Milford Regional's water?

EPA monitoring detected Copper, Dibromochloromethane, Nitrate, Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Aquarion-New Milford Regional serve?

Aquarion-New Milford Regional reports serving 13,331 people in Connecticut, per its EPA record.

Has Aquarion-New Milford Regional had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 210 violations on file for Aquarion-New Milford Regional, of which 8 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.