← Connecticut

Tap water quality report

Ledyard Wpca, Gales Ferry

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 5 contaminants and detected 5. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

5
contaminants tested
5
detected
2,369
people served
8
health-based violations
Water source
SWP
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
New London

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

8
health-based violations
22
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 2007-01-01 → 2007-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2007-01-01 → 2007-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2007-01-01 → 2007-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2007-01-01 → 2007-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2006-10-01 → 2006-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2006-10-01 → 2006-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2006-10-01 → 2006-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2006-10-01 → 2006-12-31
Other Monitoring Resolved 2023-07-01
MR Monitoring Resolved 2020-01-01

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
TTHM
94.02 µg/L 118%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 112 µg/L
53/53 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
30.2 µg/L 50%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 34.2 µg/L
53/53 SYR4 2012–2019
Copper
84 µg/L 6.5%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 120 µg/L
51/51 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0 mg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
19/19 LCR 2025
Lead
28.9 µg/L 193%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 38 µg/L
8/51 SYR4 2012–2019

Utility contact

Contact
ALLYN, III, FRED
Phone
860-464-3221
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Ledyard Wpca, Gales Ferry

Is Ledyard Wpca, Gales Ferry tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 5 contaminants in Ledyard Wpca, Gales Ferry's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Ledyard Wpca, Gales Ferry's water?

EPA monitoring detected TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Copper, Lead, Lead. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Ledyard Wpca, Gales Ferry serve?

Ledyard Wpca, Gales Ferry reports serving 2,369 people in Connecticut, per its EPA record.

Has Ledyard Wpca, Gales Ferry had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 22 violations on file for Ledyard Wpca, Gales Ferry, of which 8 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.