← Connecticut

Tap water quality report

Durham Center Division

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 80 contaminants and detected 17. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

80
contaminants tested
17
detected
1,601
people served
90
health-based violations
Water source
SWP
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Middlesex

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

90
health-based violations
255
violations on file
2
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
TT Health-based Resolved 2001-07-01
MCL Health-based Resolved 2001-04-01 → 2001-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2001-04-01 → 2001-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2001-04-01 → 2001-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2001-04-01 → 2001-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 1995-02-01 → 1995-02-28
MCL Health-based Resolved 1995-02-01 → 1995-02-28
MCL Health-based Resolved 1995-02-01 → 1995-02-28
MCL Health-based Resolved 1995-02-01 → 1995-02-28
MCL Health-based Archived 1993-08-01 → 1993-08-31

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Dibromochloromethane
4.03 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.3 µg/L
35/35 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane
3.735 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.7 µg/L
34/35 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromoform
1.8 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.1 µg/L
34/35 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0 mg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
31/31 LCR 2025
Chloroform
3 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.2 µg/L
30/35 SYR4 2012–2019
Copper
660 µg/L 51%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 706 µg/L
21/22 SYR4 2012–2019
Nitrate
3260 µg/L 33%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
16/16 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
4 µg/L 27%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
13/22 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
2.555 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.8 µg/L
8/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Nitrate-Nitrite
3071 µg/L 31%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 3260 µg/L
8/8 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
14.785 µg/L 18%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 15.8 µg/L
8/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
4.78 µg/L 8%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 5.2 µg/L
8/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
2.25 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.4 µg/L
7/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Barium
388.6 µg/L 19%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 389 µg/L
3/3 SYR4 2013–2019
Chromium
1 µg/L 1%
of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
1/3 SYR4 2013–2019
Fluoride
70 µg/L 1.8%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
1/3 SYR4 2013–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
0.8000 µg/L
No EPA limit set
1/8 SYR4 2012–2019
63 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane2,4,5-TP2,4-DAntimony, TotalArsenicAsbestosAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneCombined Radium (-226 And -228)Combined UraniumDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDinosebDiquatEthylene DibromideEndrinEthylbenzeneGlyphosateGross Alpha, Excl. Radon And UHexachlorobenzeneHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorMonobromoacetic AcidMonochloroacetic AcidNitriteOxamylPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTotal Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB)ToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl Chloridecis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
REA, BRENDAN
Phone
860-349-3625
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Durham Center Division

Is Durham Center Division tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 17 contaminants in Durham Center Division's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Durham Center Division's water?

EPA monitoring detected Dibromochloromethane, Bromodichloromethane, Bromoform, Lead, Chloroform, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Durham Center Division serve?

Durham Center Division reports serving 1,601 people in Connecticut, per its EPA record.

Has Durham Center Division had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 255 violations on file for Durham Center Division, of which 90 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 2 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.