Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 1992-07-01 → 1992-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 1992-07-01 → 1992-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 1992-07-01 → 1992-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 1992-07-01 → 1992-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 1992-07-01 → 1992-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 1991-10-01 → 1991-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 1991-10-01 → 1991-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 1991-10-01 → 1991-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 1991-10-01 → 1991-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2013-01-01 → 2013-03-31 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Copper | 618.5 µg/L 48% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 685 µg/L | 22/22 | SYR4 | 2012–2017 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 6.1 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 7.2 µg/L | 21/22 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 6.5 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 7.3 µg/L | 21/22 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 4 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.7 µg/L | 21/22 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Combined Uranium | 2.80036 µg/L 9.3% of the EPA limit 30 µg/L
worst single sample: 2.8012 µg/L | 15/19 | SYR4 | 2012–2017 |
| Lead | 0.0 mg/L 0% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 14/14 | LCR | 2023 |
| Nitrate | 80 µg/L 0.8% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 10/18 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 15.665 µg/L 20% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 15.7 µg/L | 8/8 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 10.18 µg/L 17% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 12 µg/L | 8/8 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 4.64 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5 µg/L | 7/8 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 4.43 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5 µg/L | 7/8 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Nitrate-Nitrite | 78 µg/L 0.8% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 80 µg/L | 5/9 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 2.51 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.6 µg/L | 4/8 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 3.53 µg/L 24% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 3.8 µg/L | 4/22 | SYR4 | 2012–2017 |
| Bromoform | 1.0775 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.1 µg/L | 2/22 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Fluoride | 2108 µg/L 53% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 2120 µg/L | 2/2 | SYR4 | 2015–2017 |
| Combined Radium (-226 And -228) | 1.04 pCi/L 21% of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L | 1/10 | SYR4 | 2012–2017 |
| Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U | 5.3 pCi/L 35% of the EPA limit 15 pCi/L | 1/10 | SYR4 | 2012–2017 |
62 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Ctwc - Northern Region-Lakewood
Is Ctwc - Northern Region-Lakewood tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 18 contaminants in Ctwc - Northern Region-Lakewood's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Ctwc - Northern Region-Lakewood's water?
EPA monitoring detected Copper, Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dibromochloromethane, Combined Uranium, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Ctwc - Northern Region-Lakewood serve?
Ctwc - Northern Region-Lakewood reports serving 276 people in Connecticut, per its EPA record.
Has Ctwc - Northern Region-Lakewood had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 142 violations on file for Ctwc - Northern Region-Lakewood, of which 9 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 1 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.