← Connecticut

Tap water quality report

Ctwc - Shoreline Region-Chester

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 110 contaminants and detected 23. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

110
contaminants tested
23
detected
5,030
people served
0
health-based violations
Water source
Surface water
Ownership
Private
Counties served
Middlesex

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

0
health-based violations
156
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MON Monitoring Resolved 2016-11-01 → 2016-11-30
MON Monitoring Resolved 2016-11-01 → 2016-11-30
MON Monitoring Resolved 2016-11-01 → 2016-11-30
MON Monitoring Resolved 2016-11-01 → 2016-11-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2007-07-01 → 2007-09-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2007-07-01 → 2007-09-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2007-07-01 → 2007-09-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2007-07-01 → 2007-09-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2007-07-01 → 2007-09-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2007-07-01 → 2007-09-30

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Nitrate
2034 µg/L 20%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 2510 µg/L
100/154 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane
13.3 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 16 µg/L
95/100 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
62 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 75 µg/L
93/100 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
2.78 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.9 µg/L
93/100 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
86.18 µg/L 108%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 90.5 µg/L
85/85 SYR4 2012–2019
Copper
138.5 µg/L 11%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 340 µg/L
84/90 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
21 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 23.3 µg/L
84/84 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
23 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 28 µg/L
83/84 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
45.9 µg/L 77%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 52 µg/L
83/84 SYR4 2012–2019
Nitrate-Nitrite
1796.4 µg/L 18%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 2510 µg/L
59/84 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0 mg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
38/38 LCR 2026
Monochloroacetic Acid
8 µg/L
No EPA limit set
29/84 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
43.8 µg/L 292%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 122 µg/L
18/90 SYR4 2012–2019
Barium
613.3 µg/L 31%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 2000 µg/L
15/20 SYR4 2012–2019
Fluoride
577 µg/L 14%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 670 µg/L
4/21 SYR4 2012–2019
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)
1.09 pCi/L 22%
of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
worst single sample: 1.1 pCi/L
3/4 SYR4 2014–2019
Nitrite
9.8 µg/L 1%
of the EPA limit 1000 µg/L
worst single sample: 10 µg/L
3/77 SYR4 2012–2019
Combined Uranium
2.0805 µg/L 6.9%
of the EPA limit 30 µg/L
worst single sample: 2.13 µg/L
2/5 SYR4 2014–2019
Bromoform
0.6900 µg/L
No EPA limit set
1/100 SYR4 2012–2019
Di(2-ethylhexyl) Phthalate
2.4 µg/L 40%
of the EPA limit 6 µg/L
1/11 SYR4 2013–2019
Ethylene Dibromide
0.0200 µg/L 40%
of the EPA limit 0.0500 µg/L
1/11 SYR4 2013–2019
Monobromoacetic Acid
2.9 µg/L
No EPA limit set
1/84 SYR4 2012–2019
Thallium, Total
1.4 µg/L 70%
of the EPA limit 2 µg/L
1/12 SYR4 2012–2019
87 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,4,5-TP2,4-D4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalArsenicAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChromiumDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDibromoacetic AcidDinosebDiquatEndrinEthylbenzeneGlyphosateGross Alpha, Excl. Radon And UGross Beta Particle ActivityHexachlorobenzeneHfpo-DaHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaOxamylPfbaPFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpeaPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneTolueneTotal Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB)ToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl Chloridecis-1,2-DichloroethyleneLithiumO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
MCDERMOTT, GERALD
Phone
860-664-6125
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Ctwc - Shoreline Region-Chester

Is Ctwc - Shoreline Region-Chester tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 23 contaminants in Ctwc - Shoreline Region-Chester's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Ctwc - Shoreline Region-Chester's water?

EPA monitoring detected Nitrate, Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dibromochloromethane, TTHM, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Ctwc - Shoreline Region-Chester serve?

Ctwc - Shoreline Region-Chester reports serving 5,030 people in Connecticut, per its EPA record.

Has Ctwc - Shoreline Region-Chester had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 156 violations on file for Ctwc - Shoreline Region-Chester, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.