Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2025-08-10 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2024-12-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2024-12-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2024-01-01 → 2024-03-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2024-01-01 → 2024-03-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2024-01-01 → 2024-03-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2024-01-01 → 2024-03-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2024-01-01 → 2024-03-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2024-01-01 → 2024-03-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2024-01-01 → 2024-03-31 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TTHM | 76.05 µg/L 95% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 86.2 µg/L | 63/63 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 16.41 µg/L 27% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 56.3 µg/L | 60/63 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 2.555 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.9 µg/L | 50/50 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 9.24 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 12 µg/L | 49/50 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 57.4 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 67 µg/L | 49/50 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 13 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 14 µg/L | 44/50 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 5.15 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.8 µg/L | 43/50 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0028 mg/L 19% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 19/19 | LCR | 2024 |
| Lead | 5 µg/L 33% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L | 11/30 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Bromoform | 0.6000 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/50 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 2.5 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/50 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
3 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Worthington Fire District
Is Worthington Fire District tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 11 contaminants in Worthington Fire District's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Worthington Fire District's water?
EPA monitoring detected TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Dibromochloromethane, Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Worthington Fire District serve?
Worthington Fire District reports serving 2,875 people in Connecticut, per its EPA record.
Has Worthington Fire District had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 55 violations on file for Worthington Fire District, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.