← Connecticut

Tap water quality report

Ctwc - Ashford Park Division

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 80 contaminants and detected 17. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

80
contaminants tested
17
detected
334
people served
4
health-based violations
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Private
Counties served
Windham

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

4
health-based violations
31
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 2000-09-01 → 2000-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2000-09-01 → 2000-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2000-09-01 → 2000-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2000-09-01 → 2000-09-30
Other Monitoring Resolved 2006-04-06
MR Monitoring Resolved 2005-12-01 → 2005-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2005-12-01 → 2005-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2005-12-01 → 2005-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2005-12-01 → 2005-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2005-10-01 → 2005-12-31

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Copper
96.1 µg/L 7.4%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 380 µg/L
139/139 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
18.95 µg/L 126%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 39 µg/L
68/139 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
2.2 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.4 µg/L
31/32 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane
3.6 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.7 µg/L
27/32 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0 mg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
23/23 LCR 2025
Chloroform
6.66 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 7.3 µg/L
17/32 SYR4 2012–2019
Nitrate
930 µg/L 9.3%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
16/16 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromoform
0.7000 µg/L
No EPA limit set
9/32 SYR4 2012–2019
Nitrate-Nitrite
923 µg/L 9.2%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 930 µg/L
8/8 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
13.4835 µg/L 17%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 13.76 µg/L
8/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
7.475 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 9.1 µg/L
6/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
7.8 µg/L 13%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 9.1 µg/L
6/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Barium
32.5 µg/L 1.6%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 33 µg/L
3/3 SYR4 2013–2019
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)
1.682 pCi/L 34%
of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
worst single sample: 1.7 pCi/L
3/22 SYR4 2012–2017
Dibromoacetic Acid
1.265 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.3 µg/L
2/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Fluoride
40 µg/L 1%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
1/3 SYR4 2013–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
0.6000 µg/L
No EPA limit set
1/8 SYR4 2012–2019
63 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane2,4,5-TP2,4-DAntimony, TotalArsenicAsbestosAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChromiumCombined UraniumDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDinosebDiquatEthylene DibromideEndrinEthylbenzeneGlyphosateGross Alpha, Excl. Radon And UHexachlorobenzeneHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorMonobromoacetic AcidMonochloroacetic AcidNitriteOxamylPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTotal Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB)ToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl Chloridecis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
LOWRY, PAUL C.
Phone
860-944-9655
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Ctwc - Ashford Park Division

Is Ctwc - Ashford Park Division tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 17 contaminants in Ctwc - Ashford Park Division's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Ctwc - Ashford Park Division's water?

EPA monitoring detected Copper, Lead, Dibromochloromethane, Bromodichloromethane, Lead, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Ctwc - Ashford Park Division serve?

Ctwc - Ashford Park Division reports serving 334 people in Connecticut, per its EPA record.

Has Ctwc - Ashford Park Division had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 31 violations on file for Ctwc - Ashford Park Division, of which 4 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.