Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2000-09-01 → 2000-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2000-09-01 → 2000-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2000-09-01 → 2000-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2000-09-01 → 2000-09-30 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2006-04-06 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2005-12-01 → 2005-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2005-12-01 → 2005-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2005-12-01 → 2005-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2005-12-01 → 2005-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2005-10-01 → 2005-12-31 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Copper | 96.1 µg/L 7.4% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 380 µg/L | 139/139 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 18.95 µg/L 126% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 39 µg/L | 68/139 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 2.2 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.4 µg/L | 31/32 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 3.6 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.7 µg/L | 27/32 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0 mg/L 0% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 23/23 | LCR | 2025 |
| Chloroform | 6.66 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 7.3 µg/L | 17/32 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Nitrate | 930 µg/L 9.3% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 16/16 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromoform | 0.7000 µg/L No EPA limit set | 9/32 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Nitrate-Nitrite | 923 µg/L 9.2% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 930 µg/L | 8/8 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 13.4835 µg/L 17% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 13.76 µg/L | 8/8 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 7.475 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 9.1 µg/L | 6/8 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 7.8 µg/L 13% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 9.1 µg/L | 6/8 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Barium | 32.5 µg/L 1.6% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 33 µg/L | 3/3 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Combined Radium (-226 And -228) | 1.682 pCi/L 34% of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
worst single sample: 1.7 pCi/L | 3/22 | SYR4 | 2012–2017 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 1.265 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.3 µg/L | 2/8 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Fluoride | 40 µg/L 1% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L | 1/3 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 0.6000 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/8 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
63 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Ctwc - Ashford Park Division
Is Ctwc - Ashford Park Division tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 17 contaminants in Ctwc - Ashford Park Division's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Ctwc - Ashford Park Division's water?
EPA monitoring detected Copper, Lead, Dibromochloromethane, Bromodichloromethane, Lead, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Ctwc - Ashford Park Division serve?
Ctwc - Ashford Park Division reports serving 334 people in Connecticut, per its EPA record.
Has Ctwc - Ashford Park Division had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 31 violations on file for Ctwc - Ashford Park Division, of which 4 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.