Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2024-10-01 → 2024-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2024-10-01 → 2024-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2024-10-01 → 2024-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2024-10-01 → 2024-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2024-10-01 → 2024-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2024-10-01 → 2024-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2024-10-01 → 2024-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2024-10-01 → 2024-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2024-07-01 → 2024-09-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2024-07-01 → 2024-09-30 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TTHM | 92.545 µg/L 116% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 114 µg/L | 112/112 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 46.04 µg/L 77% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 67.8 µg/L | 112/112 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 16.225 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 18.2 µg/L | 76/76 | SYR4 | 2015–2019 |
| Chloroform | 89.175 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 97.9 µg/L | 76/76 | SYR4 | 2015–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 4.725 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.7 µg/L | 76/76 | SYR4 | 2015–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 21.85 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 23.7 µg/L | 76/76 | SYR4 | 2015–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 34.17 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 43.5 µg/L | 75/76 | SYR4 | 2015–2019 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 4.76 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 7.6 µg/L | 39/76 | SYR4 | 2015–2019 |
| Bromoform | 0.7920 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 0.8400 µg/L | 13/76 | SYR4 | 2015–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0104 mg/L 69% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 9/9 | LCR | 2025 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 1.675 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.7 µg/L | 6/76 | SYR4 | 2015–2019 |
| Lithium | 14.5 µg/L No EPA limit set | 2/4 | UCMR-5 | 2024 |
30 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Us Department of the Army Fort Carson
Is Us Department of the Army Fort Carson tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 12 contaminants in Us Department of the Army Fort Carson's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Us Department of the Army Fort Carson's water?
EPA monitoring detected TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dibromochloromethane, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Us Department of the Army Fort Carson serve?
Us Department of the Army Fort Carson reports serving 48,000 people in Colorado, per its EPA record.
Has Us Department of the Army Fort Carson had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 22 violations on file for Us Department of the Army Fort Carson, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.