← Colorado

Tap water quality report

Craig City of

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 109 contaminants and detected 17. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

109
contaminants tested
17
detected
8,930
people served
0
health-based violations
Water source
Surface water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Moffat

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

0
health-based violations
121
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MR Monitoring Resolved 2026-04-01
MR Monitoring Resolved 2026-04-01
MR Monitoring Resolved 2026-04-01
MR Monitoring Resolved 2024-08-01 → 2024-08-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2024-08-01 → 2024-08-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2024-08-01 → 2024-08-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2024-08-01 → 2024-08-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2024-08-01 → 2024-08-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2024-08-01 → 2024-08-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2023-01-01

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
TTHM
88.965 µg/L 111%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 97.8 µg/L
58/58 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
51.935 µg/L 87%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 70.7 µg/L
58/58 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0020 mg/L 13%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
28/28 LCR 2025
Nitrate
1200 µg/L 12%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
12/16 SYR4 2012–2019
Fluoride
815.5 µg/L 20%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 910 µg/L
10/11 SYR4 2012–2019
Barium
45.3 µg/L 2.3%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 46 µg/L
8/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane
12.78 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 13.2 µg/L
7/7 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
58.82 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 63.2 µg/L
7/7 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
16.55 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 18.2 µg/L
6/6 SYR4 2016–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
21.325 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 21.7 µg/L
6/6 SYR4 2016–2019
Dibromochloromethane
2.27 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.3 µg/L
4/7 SYR4 2012–2019
Selenium
8.69 µg/L 17%
of the EPA limit 50 µg/L
worst single sample: 9.2 µg/L
4/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Lithium
22 µg/L
No EPA limit set
4/4 UCMR-5 2023
Monochloroacetic Acid
2.55 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.6 µg/L
2/6 SYR4 2016–2019
Nitrate-Nitrite
1059.5 µg/L 11%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 1100 µg/L
2/2 SYR4 2012–2016
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)
0.6000 pCi/L 12%
of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
1/1 SYR4 2013
Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U
1.3 pCi/L 8.7%
of the EPA limit 15 pCi/L
1/1 SYR4 2013
92 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,3,7,8-TCDD2,4,5-TP2,4-D4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalArsenicAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalBromoformChlorobenzeneCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChloriteChromiumCombined UraniumDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDibromoacetic AcidDinosebDiquatEthylene DibromideEndothallEndrinEthylbenzeneHexachlorobenzeneHfpo-DaHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorMonobromoacetic AcidNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaNitriteOxamylPfbaPFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpeaPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaPentachlorophenolPicloramSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTotal Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB)ToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
RAY, CARL R
Phone
970-826-2022
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Craig City of

Is Craig City of tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 17 contaminants in Craig City of's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Craig City of's water?

EPA monitoring detected TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Lead, Nitrate, Fluoride, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Craig City of serve?

Craig City of reports serving 8,930 people in Colorado, per its EPA record.

Has Craig City of had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 121 violations on file for Craig City of, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.