Tap WaterIndex

← Colorado

Tap water quality report

Newell Warnock Wa

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 77 contaminants and detected 15. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

77
contaminants tested
15
detected
160
people served
143
health-based violations
Colorado rankingsLead in ColoradoPFAS in Colorado
Water source
Surface water
Ownership
Private
Counties served
Larimer

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

143
health-based violations
205
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
TT Health-based Resolved 2023-02-01 → 2023-02-28
TT Health-based Resolved 2023-02-01 → 2023-02-28
TT Health-based Resolved 2023-02-01 → 2023-02-28
TT Health-based Resolved 2023-02-01 → 2023-02-28
MCL Health-based Resolved 2012-04-01 → 2012-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2012-04-01 → 2012-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2012-04-01 → 2012-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2012-04-01 → 2012-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2012-04-01 → 2012-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2012-04-01 → 2012-06-30

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
TTHM
81.12 µg/L 101%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 101.7 µg/L
33/33 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
89.809 µg/L 150%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 99.97 µg/L
32/32 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane
3.94 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.3 µg/L
23/23 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
72.33 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 95 µg/L
23/23 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
24.6 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 33.7 µg/L
21/21 SYR4 2014–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
33.5 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 39.39 µg/L
21/21 SYR4 2014–2019
Lead
0.0025 mg/L 17%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
 19/19 LCR 2025
Monochloroacetic Acid
2.8165 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.59 µg/L
14/21 SYR4 2014–2019
Fluoride
464 µg/L 12%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 540 µg/L
9/9 SYR4 2012–2019
Barium
8 µg/L 0.4%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
 8/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)
0.4850 pCi/L 9.7%
of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
worst single sample: 0.5000 pCi/L
2/2 SYR4 2012–2018
Nitrate
200 µg/L 2%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
 2/18 SYR4 2012–2019
Combined Uranium
2.4 µg/L 8%
of the EPA limit 30 µg/L
 1/2 SYR4 2012–2018
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
0.3000 µg/L 0.6%
of the EPA limit 50 µg/L
 1/3 SYR4 2012–2017
Nitrate-Nitrite
200 µg/L 2%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
 1/1 SYR4 2012
62 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane2,4,5-TP2,4-DAntimony, TotalArsenicAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalBromoformChlorobenzeneCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChromiumDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDibromoacetic AcidDibromochloromethaneDinosebDiquatEthylene DibromideEndothallEndrinEthylbenzeneGross Alpha, Excl. Radon And UHexachlorobenzeneHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideLassoMercuryMethoxychlorMonobromoacetic AcidNitriteOxamylPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTotal Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB)ToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
GALE, JAMES A
Phone
970-669-6606
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Newell Warnock Wa

Is Newell Warnock Wa tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 15 contaminants in Newell Warnock Wa's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Newell Warnock Wa's water?

EPA monitoring detected TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dichloroacetic Acid, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Newell Warnock Wa serve?

Newell Warnock Wa reports serving 160 people in Colorado, per its EPA record.

Has Newell Warnock Wa had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 205 violations on file for Newell Warnock Wa, of which 143 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.