Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MR | Monitoring | Archived | 2022-04-01 → 2022-04-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Archived | 2022-04-01 → 2022-04-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2020-10-01 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2020-10-01 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2020-10-01 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2018-11-01 → 2018-11-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2018-11-01 → 2018-11-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2018-11-01 → 2018-11-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2006-10-01 → 2006-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2006-10-01 → 2006-12-31 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TTHM | 65.625 µg/L 82% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 83.7 µg/L | 252/252 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 41.2815 µg/L 69% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 57.6 µg/L | 252/252 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 5.895 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 7.2 µg/L | 162/162 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 52.79 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 73.2 µg/L | 162/162 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 20.645 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 36.8 µg/L | 160/160 | SYR4 | 2015–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 18.3045 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 19.9 µg/L | 160/160 | SYR4 | 2015–2019 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 2.476 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.7 µg/L | 77/160 | SYR4 | 2015–2019 |
| Chlorite | 420 µg/L 42% of the EPA limit 1000 µg/L
worst single sample: 450 µg/L | 27/27 | SYR4 | 2013–2016 |
| Lead | 0.0033 mg/L 22% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 18/18 | LCR | 2025 |
| Nitrate | 300 µg/L 3% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 12/22 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Barium | 13.55 µg/L 0.7% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 14 µg/L | 10/10 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Fluoride | 758 µg/L 19% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 800 µg/L | 8/8 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 9.0985 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 9.48 µg/L | 8/160 | SYR4 | 2015–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 0.6850 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 0.7000 µg/L | 4/162 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U | 0.6000 pCi/L 4% of the EPA limit 15 pCi/L | 1/1 | SYR4 | 2012 |
| Nitrate-Nitrite | 300 µg/L 3% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 1/1 | SYR4 | 2012 |
92 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Loveland City of
Is Loveland City of tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 16 contaminants in Loveland City of's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Loveland City of's water?
EPA monitoring detected TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dichloroacetic Acid, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Loveland City of serve?
Loveland City of reports serving 91,077 people in Colorado, per its EPA record.
Has Loveland City of had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 22 violations on file for Loveland City of, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.