← Colorado

Tap water quality report

Little Thompson Wd

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 42 contaminants and detected 10. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

42
contaminants tested
10
detected
25,654
people served
5
health-based violations
Water source
SWP
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Larimer

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

5
health-based violations
7
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 2005-08-01 → 2005-08-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2005-08-01 → 2005-08-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2005-08-01 → 2005-08-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2005-08-01 → 2005-08-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2005-08-01 → 2005-08-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 1997-06-01 → 1997-06-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 1997-06-01 → 1997-06-30

PFAS detected

PFAS are industrial “forever chemicals”. These are the EPA's latest nationwide test results (2023–2025).
ContaminantMaxDetection ratePeriod
PFOA 0.0048 µg/L 1/4 2024

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
TTHM
62.1035 µg/L 78%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 74.8 µg/L
124/124 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
49.62 µg/L 83%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 69.8 µg/L
124/124 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane
5.1 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 6 µg/L
72/72 SYR4 2015–2019
Chloroform
48.645 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 63 µg/L
72/72 SYR4 2015–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
17.635 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 20.8 µg/L
72/72 SYR4 2015–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
21.925 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 23.6 µg/L
72/72 SYR4 2015–2019
Monochloroacetic Acid
3 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.1 µg/L
45/72 SYR4 2015–2019
Lead
0.0090 mg/L 60%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
4/4 LCR 1996
Dibromochloromethane
0.6000 µg/L
No EPA limit set
1/72 SYR4 2015–2019
32 contaminants tested, none detected
11Cl-PF3OUdS4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaBromoformDibromoacetic AcidHfpo-DaMonobromoacetic AcidNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaPfbaPFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOSPfpeaPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaLithium

Utility contact

Contact
KAUFFMAN, AMBER
Phone
970-532-2096
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Little Thompson Wd

Is Little Thompson Wd tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 10 contaminants in Little Thompson Wd's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Little Thompson Wd's water?

EPA monitoring detected TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dichloroacetic Acid, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Little Thompson Wd serve?

Little Thompson Wd reports serving 25,654 people in Colorado, per its EPA record.

Has Little Thompson Wd had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 7 violations on file for Little Thompson Wd, of which 5 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.