← Colorado

Tap water quality report

Durango West Md No 1

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 80 contaminants and detected 18. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

80
contaminants tested
18
detected
750
people served
7
health-based violations
Water source
SWP
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
La Plata

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

7
health-based violations
112
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 2020-01-01 → 2020-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2020-01-01 → 2020-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2020-01-01 → 2020-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2020-01-01 → 2020-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2019-10-01 → 2019-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2019-10-01 → 2019-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2019-10-01 → 2019-12-31
Other Monitoring Resolved 2016-07-01
Other Monitoring Resolved 2016-07-01
Other Monitoring Resolved 2016-07-01

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
TTHM
84.805 µg/L 106%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 89.9 µg/L
32/32 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
67.8 µg/L 113%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 90.3 µg/L
32/32 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0010 mg/L 6.7%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
15/15 LCR 2025
Bromodichloromethane
20.44 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 22 µg/L
13/13 SYR4 2015–2019
Chloroform
61.34 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 62 µg/L
13/13 SYR4 2015–2019
Dibromochloromethane
7.2 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 7.5 µg/L
13/13 SYR4 2015–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
38.6 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 48.5 µg/L
13/13 SYR4 2015–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
26.28 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 27 µg/L
13/13 SYR4 2015–2019
Nitrate
186 µg/L 1.9%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
10/18 SYR4 2012–2019
Monochloroacetic Acid
2.75 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.9 µg/L
7/13 SYR4 2015–2019
Bromoform
1.36 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.5 µg/L
5/13 SYR4 2015–2019
Barium
110 µg/L 5.5%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
3/3 SYR4 2013–2019
Fluoride
592 µg/L 15%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 600 µg/L
3/3 SYR4 2013–2019
Nitrate-Nitrite
169.8 µg/L 1.7%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 186 µg/L
3/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
1.1 µg/L
No EPA limit set
2/13 SYR4 2015–2019
Chromium
1.3 µg/L 1.3%
of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
1/3 SYR4 2013–2019
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)
1.5 pCi/L 30%
of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
1/1 SYR4 2019
Monobromoacetic Acid
1 µg/L
No EPA limit set
1/13 SYR4 2015–2019
62 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane2,4,5-TP2,4-DAntimony, TotalArsenicAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalBromateChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneCombined UraniumDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDinosebDiquatEthylene DibromideEndothallEndrinEthylbenzeneGross Alpha, Excl. Radon And UGross Beta Particle ActivityHexachlorobenzeneHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorNitriteOxamylPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTotal Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB)ToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
ANDERSON, JANET
Phone
970-259-4267
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Durango West Md No 1

Is Durango West Md No 1 tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 18 contaminants in Durango West Md No 1's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Durango West Md No 1's water?

EPA monitoring detected TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Lead, Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Durango West Md No 1 serve?

Durango West Md No 1 reports serving 750 people in Colorado, per its EPA record.

Has Durango West Md No 1 had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 112 violations on file for Durango West Md No 1, of which 7 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.