← Colorado

Tap water quality report

Cragmont Wc

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 78 contaminants and detected 21. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

78
contaminants tested
21
detected
50
people served
20
health-based violations
Water source
Surface water
Ownership
Private
Counties served
Jefferson

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

20
health-based violations
86
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
TT Health-based Resolved 2021-12-01 → 2021-12-31
TT Health-based Resolved 2021-12-01 → 2021-12-31
TT Health-based Resolved 2021-12-01 → 2021-12-31
TT Health-based Resolved 2021-12-01 → 2021-12-31
TT Health-based Resolved 2021-11-01 → 2021-11-30
TT Health-based Resolved 2021-11-01 → 2021-11-30
TT Health-based Resolved 2021-11-01 → 2021-11-30
TT Health-based Resolved 2021-11-01 → 2021-11-30
TT Health-based Resolved 2021-10-01 → 2021-10-31
TT Health-based Resolved 2021-10-01 → 2021-10-31

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
TTHM
57.785 µg/L 72%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 87.6 µg/L
28/28 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
37.88 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 46 µg/L
25/26 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
61.2 µg/L 102%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 68.5 µg/L
25/25 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane
10.795 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 13.2 µg/L
24/26 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
5.04 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 10 µg/L
23/26 SYR4 2012–2019
Nitrate
5100 µg/L 51%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
20/20 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
21.17 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 24.5 µg/L
19/19 SYR4 2015–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
31.24 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 37.9 µg/L
19/19 SYR4 2015–2019
Lead
0.00050 mg/L 3.3%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
13/13 LCR 2025
Barium
72.85 µg/L 3.6%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 76 µg/L
10/10 SYR4 2012–2019
Fluoride
432 µg/L 11%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 450 µg/L
10/10 SYR4 2012–2019
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)
0.3900 pCi/L 7.8%
of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
worst single sample: 0.4000 pCi/L
2/2 SYR4 2012
Dibromoacetic Acid
1.3 µg/L
No EPA limit set
2/19 SYR4 2015–2019
Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U
0.8950 pCi/L 6%
of the EPA limit 15 pCi/L
worst single sample: 0.9000 pCi/L
2/2 SYR4 2012
Monochloroacetic Acid
1.4 µg/L
No EPA limit set
2/19 SYR4 2015–2019
Nitrate-Nitrite
3155 µg/L 32%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 3200 µg/L
2/2 SYR4 2012–2013
Xylenes, Total
10.135 µg/L 0.1%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 10.6 µg/L
2/24 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromoform
0.9400 µg/L
No EPA limit set
1/26 SYR4 2012–2019
Chromium
2 µg/L 2%
of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
1/10 SYR4 2012–2019
Ethylbenzene
0.8300 µg/L 0.1%
of the EPA limit 700 µg/L
1/24 SYR4 2012–2019
Selenium
5 µg/L 10%
of the EPA limit 50 µg/L
1/10 SYR4 2012–2019
57 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane2,3,7,8-TCDD2,4,5-TP2,4-DAntimony, TotalArsenicAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneCombined UraniumDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDinosebDiquatEthylene DibromideEndothallEndrinHexachlorobenzeneHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorMonobromoacetic AcidNitriteOxamylPentachlorophenolPicloramSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTotal Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB)ToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl Chloridecis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
LEWIS, NORMAN
Phone
303-717-1810
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Cragmont Wc

Is Cragmont Wc tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 21 contaminants in Cragmont Wc's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Cragmont Wc's water?

EPA monitoring detected TTHM, Chloroform, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Bromodichloromethane, Dibromochloromethane, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Cragmont Wc serve?

Cragmont Wc reports serving 50 people in Colorado, per its EPA record.

Has Cragmont Wc had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 86 violations on file for Cragmont Wc, of which 20 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.