Tap WaterIndex

← Colorado

Tap water quality report

Asgard Subdivision Wa

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 75 contaminants and detected 13. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

75
contaminants tested
13
detected
80
people served
108
health-based violations
Colorado rankingsLead in ColoradoPFAS in Colorado
Water source
SWP
Ownership
Private
Counties served
Garfield

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

108
health-based violations
246
violations on file
2
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 2025-01-01 → 2025-01-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2025-01-01 → 2025-01-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2025-01-01 → 2025-01-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2025-01-01 → 2025-01-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2025-01-01 → 2025-01-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2024-03-01 → 2024-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2024-03-01 → 2024-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2024-03-01 → 2024-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2024-03-01 → 2024-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2024-03-01 → 2024-03-31

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Nitrate
18825 µg/L 188%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 19800 µg/L
72/72 SYR4 2012–2019
Selenium
152 µg/L 304%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 50 µg/L
worst single sample: 170 µg/L
37/37 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0022 mg/L 15%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
 22/22 LCR 2025
TTHM
11.79 µg/L 15%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 12.3 µg/L
4/5 SYR4 2012–2019
Barium
25.6 µg/L 1.3%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 26 µg/L
3/3 SYR4 2012–2018
Fluoride
492 µg/L 12%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 500 µg/L
3/3 SYR4 2012–2018
Bromodichloromethane
0.5985 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 0.6000 µg/L
2/3 SYR4 2016–2019
Bromoform
1.854 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.9 µg/L
2/3 SYR4 2016–2019
Combined Uranium
9.565 µg/L 32%
of the EPA limit 30 µg/L
worst single sample: 9.7 µg/L
2/2 SYR4 2013–2019
Dibromochloromethane
1.68 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.7 µg/L
2/3 SYR4 2016–2019
Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U
2.8995 pCi/L 19%
of the EPA limit 15 pCi/L
worst single sample: 3.01 pCi/L
2/2 SYR4 2013–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
2.28 µg/L 3.8%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 2.3 µg/L
2/3 SYR4 2012–2018
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)
1.6 pCi/L 32%
of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
 1/1 SYR4 2019
62 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane2,4,5-TP2,4-DAntimony, TotalArsenicAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChloroformChromiumDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDibromoacetic AcidDichloroacetic AcidDinosebDiquatEthylene DibromideEndothallEndrinEthylbenzeneHexachlorobenzeneHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorMonobromoacetic AcidMonochloroacetic AcidOxamylPentachlorophenolPicloramSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTotal Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB)ToxapheneTrichloroacetic AcidTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
OTTOSEN, MIKE
Phone
970-876-0562
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Asgard Subdivision Wa

Is Asgard Subdivision Wa tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 13 contaminants in Asgard Subdivision Wa's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Asgard Subdivision Wa's water?

EPA monitoring detected Nitrate, Selenium, Lead, TTHM, Barium, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Asgard Subdivision Wa serve?

Asgard Subdivision Wa reports serving 80 people in Colorado, per its EPA record.

Has Asgard Subdivision Wa had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 246 violations on file for Asgard Subdivision Wa, of which 108 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 2 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.