Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2023-09-29 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2023-09-29 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2023-09-29 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2023-09-29 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2018-10-01 → 2018-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2018-10-01 → 2018-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2018-10-01 → 2018-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2010-10-01 → 2010-10-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2010-10-01 → 2010-10-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2010-10-01 → 2010-10-31 |
PFAS detected
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TTHM | 73.64 µg/L 92% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 79.9 µg/L | 119/119 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 51.15 µg/L 85% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 65 µg/L | 118/120 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 7.2 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 11 µg/L | 97/146 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 15 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 17 µg/L | 89/146 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 61.75 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 600 µg/L | 86/146 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 26.3 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 46 µg/L | 79/82 | SYR4 | 2015–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 19 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 30 µg/L | 77/82 | SYR4 | 2015–2019 |
| Bromoform | 5.095 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 12 µg/L | 62/146 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0017 mg/L 11% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 27/27 | LCR | 2025 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 3.175 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.1 µg/L | 26/82 | SYR4 | 2015–2019 |
| Lithium | 33.3 µg/L No EPA limit set | 8/10 | UCMR-5 | 2025 |
28 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Security Water District
Is Security Water District tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 14 contaminants in Security Water District's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Security Water District's water?
EPA monitoring detected TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Dibromochloromethane, Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Security Water District serve?
Security Water District reports serving 20,000 people in Colorado, per its EPA record.
Has Security Water District had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 246 violations on file for Security Water District, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.