Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2020-06-01 → 2020-06-30 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2020-06-01 → 2020-06-30 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2020-06-01 → 2020-06-30 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2020-06-01 → 2020-06-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2010-08-01 → 2010-08-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2010-08-01 → 2010-08-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2010-08-01 → 2010-08-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2010-08-01 → 2010-08-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2013-10-01 → 2013-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2013-10-01 → 2013-12-31 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 41.0255 µg/L 68% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 54.22 µg/L | 94/94 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 80.44 µg/L 101% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 96.2 µg/L | 93/93 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 18.36 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 19.2 µg/L | 57/57 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 63.06 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 71.9 µg/L | 57/57 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 8.06 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 9.3 µg/L | 57/57 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 20.556 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 25 µg/L | 54/54 | SYR4 | 2015–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 17.001 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 20.25 µg/L | 54/54 | SYR4 | 2015–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 1.908 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.94 µg/L | 25/54 | SYR4 | 2015–2019 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 2.546 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.83 µg/L | 25/54 | SYR4 | 2015–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0050 mg/L 33% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 20/20 | LCR | 2025 |
| Nitrate | 200 µg/L 2% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 16/22 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Fluoride | 655 µg/L 16% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 770 µg/L | 11/11 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Barium | 46.65 µg/L 2.3% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 48 µg/L | 10/10 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromoform | 1.1 µg/L No EPA limit set | 4/57 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 2.614 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.74 µg/L | 3/54 | SYR4 | 2015–2019 |
| Chromium | 1.95 µg/L 2% of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
worst single sample: 2 µg/L | 2/10 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Arsenic | 1 µg/L 10% of the EPA limit 10 µg/L | 1/10 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Nitrate-Nitrite | 86 µg/L 0.9% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 1/1 | SYR4 | 2012 |
| Selenium | 2 µg/L 4% of the EPA limit 50 µg/L | 1/10 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lithium | 9.09 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/4 | UCMR-5 | 2025 |
84 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Roxborough Wsd
Is Roxborough Wsd tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 20 contaminants in Roxborough Wsd's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Roxborough Wsd's water?
EPA monitoring detected Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), TTHM, Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dibromochloromethane, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Roxborough Wsd serve?
Roxborough Wsd reports serving 13,765 people in Colorado, per its EPA record.
Has Roxborough Wsd had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 25 violations on file for Roxborough Wsd, of which 8 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.