← Colorado

Tap water quality report

Superior Md No 1

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 102 contaminants and detected 13. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

102
contaminants tested
13
detected
17,900
people served
20
health-based violations
Water source
Surface water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Boulder

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

20
health-based violations
162
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
TT Health-based Resolved 2021-12-01 → 2021-12-31
TT Health-based Resolved 2021-12-01 → 2021-12-31
TT Health-based Resolved 2021-12-01 → 2021-12-31
TT Health-based Resolved 2021-12-01 → 2021-12-31
TT Health-based Resolved 2021-12-01 → 2021-12-31
TT Health-based Resolved 2020-11-01 → 2020-11-30
TT Health-based Resolved 2020-11-01 → 2020-11-30
TT Health-based Resolved 2020-11-01 → 2020-11-30
TT Health-based Resolved 2013-05-01 → 2013-05-31
TT Health-based Resolved 2013-05-01 → 2013-05-31

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
TTHM
74.4 µg/L 93%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 142.1 µg/L
141/141 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
39.315 µg/L 66%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 46.15 µg/L
140/141 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane
4.995 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 6.2 µg/L
82/82 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
75.305 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 137.6 µg/L
82/82 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
19.82 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 22.8 µg/L
79/80 SYR4 2015–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
17.11 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 20.8 µg/L
79/80 SYR4 2015–2019
Monochloroacetic Acid
4.82 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 6.3 µg/L
60/80 SYR4 2015–2019
Lead
0.0 mg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
25/25 LCR 2025
Fluoride
785 µg/L 20%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 850 µg/L
14/14 SYR4 2012–2019
Barium
25.3 µg/L 1.3%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 26 µg/L
8/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Monobromoacetic Acid
4.23 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.4 µg/L
2/80 SYR4 2015–2019
Selenium
1 µg/L 2%
of the EPA limit 50 µg/L
2/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Chromium
1 µg/L 1%
of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
1/8 SYR4 2012–2019
89 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,4,5-TP2,4-D4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalArsenicAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalBromoformChlorobenzeneCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDibromoacetic AcidDibromochloromethaneDinosebDiquatEthylene DibromideEndothallEndrinEthylbenzeneHexachlorobenzeneHfpo-DaHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaNitrateOxamylPfbaPFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpeaPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaPentachlorophenolPicloramSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTotal Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB)ToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneLithiumO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
WIDNER, JIM
Phone
720-428-9182
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Superior Md No 1

Is Superior Md No 1 tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 13 contaminants in Superior Md No 1's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Superior Md No 1's water?

EPA monitoring detected TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dichloroacetic Acid, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Superior Md No 1 serve?

Superior Md No 1 reports serving 17,900 people in Colorado, per its EPA record.

Has Superior Md No 1 had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 162 violations on file for Superior Md No 1, of which 20 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.