← Colorado

Tap water quality report

Joint Water Purification Plant

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 70 contaminants and detected 13. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

70
contaminants tested
13
detected
0
people served
0
health-based violations
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Private
Counties served
Arapahoe

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

0
health-based violations
84
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MR Monitoring Resolved 2017-01-01 → 2019-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2017-01-01 → 2019-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2017-01-01 → 2019-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2017-01-01 → 2019-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2017-01-01 → 2019-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2017-01-01 → 2019-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2017-01-01 → 2019-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2017-01-01 → 2019-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2017-01-01 → 2019-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2017-01-01 → 2019-12-31

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Nitrate
6685 µg/L 67%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 7400 µg/L
32/32 SYR4 2012–2019
Combined Uranium
37.4 µg/L 125%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 30 µg/L
worst single sample: 41 µg/L
19/19 SYR4 2014–2018
Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U
17.395 pCi/L 116%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 15 pCi/L
worst single sample: 19.84 pCi/L
16/20 SYR4 2014–2018
Barium
208 µg/L 10%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 210 µg/L
3/3 SYR4 2013–2019
Bromoform
13.61 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 14.2 µg/L
3/4 SYR4 2012–2018
Dibromochloromethane
3.81 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.9 µg/L
3/4 SYR4 2012–2018
Fluoride
534 µg/L 13%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 540 µg/L
3/3 SYR4 2013–2019
Selenium
17.6 µg/L 35%
of the EPA limit 50 µg/L
worst single sample: 18 µg/L
3/3 SYR4 2013–2019
TTHM
50.55 µg/L 63%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 54.1 µg/L
3/3 SYR4 2017–2019
Arsenic
2.223 µg/L 22%
of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
worst single sample: 2.3 µg/L
2/3 SYR4 2013–2019
Bromodichloromethane
0.5785 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 0.5800 µg/L
2/4 SYR4 2012–2018
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)
1.1 pCi/L 22%
of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
1/1 SYR4 2014
Nitrate-Nitrite
600 µg/L 6%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
1/1 SYR4 2019
57 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane2,4,5-TP2,4-DAntimony, TotalAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChloroformChromiumDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDinosebDiquatEthylene DibromideEndothallEndrinEthylbenzeneHexachlorobenzeneHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorNitriteOxamylPentachlorophenolPicloramSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTotal Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB)ToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
WITTER, STEVE
Phone
303-790-4830
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Joint Water Purification Plant

Is Joint Water Purification Plant tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 13 contaminants in Joint Water Purification Plant's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Joint Water Purification Plant's water?

EPA monitoring detected Nitrate, Combined Uranium, Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U, Barium, Bromoform, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Joint Water Purification Plant serve?

Joint Water Purification Plant reports serving 0 people in Colorado, per its EPA record.

Has Joint Water Purification Plant had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 84 violations on file for Joint Water Purification Plant, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.