Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| TT | Health-based | Unaddressed | 2024-10-17 |
| RPT | Monitoring | Unaddressed | 2024-10-17 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2012-01-01 → 2012-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2012-01-01 → 2012-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2012-01-01 → 2012-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2012-01-01 → 2012-12-31 |
PFAS detected
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nitrate | 7721.29 µg/L 77% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 11209.6 µg/L | 950/958 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Tetrachloroethylene | 5.145 µg/L 103% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 5 µg/L
worst single sample: 7.4 µg/L | 172/269 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Barium | 200 µg/L 10% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 230 µg/L | 54/70 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Fluoride | 300 µg/L 7.5% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L | 54/70 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| 1,1-Dichloroethylene | 1.18 µg/L 17% of the EPA limit 7 µg/L
worst single sample: 1.5 µg/L | 45/135 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 7.925 µg/L 9.9% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 9 µg/L | 36/42 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 2.52 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.1 µg/L | 35/45 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 1.71 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2 µg/L | 30/45 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Bromoform | 4 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5 µg/L | 29/45 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Combined Uranium | 8.47214 µg/L 28% of the EPA limit 30 µg/L
worst single sample: 9.6701 µg/L | 29/29 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0 mg/L 0% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 27/27 | LCR | 2025 |
| 1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE | 0.0310 µg/L 16% of the EPA limit 0.2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 0.0500 µg/L | 20/101 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 1.01 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.1 µg/L | 19/45 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 2 µg/L 3.3% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L | 13/42 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 2 µg/L No EPA limit set | 12/42 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Lithium | 11.6 µg/L No EPA limit set | 12/58 | UCMR-5 | 2023 |
| Arsenic | 2.965 µg/L 30% of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
worst single sample: 3 µg/L | 8/70 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 1 µg/L No EPA limit set | 3/42 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Copper | 690 µg/L 53% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L | 1/70 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Nitrite | 0.8000 µg/L 0.1% of the EPA limit 1000 µg/L | 1/71 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Toluene | 0.5000 µg/L 0.1% of the EPA limit 1000 µg/L | 1/80 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
72 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Porterville, City of
Is Porterville, City of tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 29 contaminants in Porterville, City of's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Porterville, City of's water?
EPA monitoring detected Nitrate, Tetrachloroethylene, Barium, Fluoride, 1,1-Dichloroethylene, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Porterville, City of serve?
Porterville, City of reports serving 63,487 people in California, per its EPA record.
Has Porterville, City of had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 6 violations on file for Porterville, City of, of which 1 is health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 2 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.