← California

Tap water quality report

Lindsay, City of

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 93 contaminants and detected 24. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

93
contaminants tested
24
detected
12,659
people served
175
health-based violations
Water source
Surface water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Tulare

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

175
health-based violations
183
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Archived 2026-01-01 → 2026-03-31
MCL Health-based Archived 2026-01-01 → 2026-03-31
MCL Health-based Archived 2026-01-01 → 2026-03-31
MCL Health-based Archived 2026-01-01 → 2026-03-31
MCL Health-based Archived 2025-10-01 → 2025-12-31
MCL Health-based Archived 2025-10-01 → 2025-12-31
MCL Health-based Archived 2025-07-01 → 2025-09-30
MCL Health-based Archived 2025-07-01 → 2025-09-30
MCL Health-based Archived 2025-07-01 → 2025-09-30
MCL Health-based Archived 2025-04-01 → 2025-06-30

PFAS detected

PFAS are industrial “forever chemicals”. These are the EPA's latest nationwide test results (2023–2025).
ContaminantMaxDetection ratePeriod
PFOA 0.0083 µg/L 2/4 2025
PFOS 0.0110 µg/L 2/4 2025
PFBS 0.0033 µg/L 1/4 2025
Pfpea 0.0031 µg/L 1/4 2025

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
TTHM
130 µg/L 163%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 220 µg/L
224/228 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
98.9 µg/L 165%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 150 µg/L
172/224 SYR4 2013–2019
Bromoform
27 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 63 µg/L
171/228 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
16.9 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 26 µg/L
163/228 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
8.35 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 15 µg/L
142/224 SYR4 2013–2019
Chloroform
120 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 180 µg/L
140/228 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane
14.45 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 20 µg/L
132/228 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
68.4 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 120 µg/L
115/224 SYR4 2013–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
39.6 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 64 µg/L
113/224 SYR4 2013–2019
Nitrate
7530 µg/L 75%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 8362 µg/L
108/126 SYR4 2012–2019
1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE
0.4175 µg/L 209%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 0.2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 0.5300 µg/L
56/60 SYR4 2012–2019
Monochloroacetic Acid
5.43 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.8 µg/L
48/224 SYR4 2013–2019
Lead
0.0 mg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
29/29 LCR 2024
Monobromoacetic Acid
3.78 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.9 µg/L
17/224 SYR4 2013–2019
Barium
516 µg/L 26%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 530 µg/L
5/13 SYR4 2012–2019
Fluoride
187 µg/L 4.7%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 190 µg/L
4/13 SYR4 2012–2019
Arsenic
3.01 µg/L 30%
of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
worst single sample: 3.1 µg/L
3/13 SYR4 2012–2019
Nitrate-Nitrite
6520 µg/L 65%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 6600 µg/L
2/5 SYR4 2017–2019
Tetrachloroethylene
0.5575 µg/L 11%
of the EPA limit 5 µg/L
worst single sample: 0.5600 µg/L
2/17 SYR4 2012–2019
Combined Uranium
4.917 µg/L 16%
of the EPA limit 30 µg/L
1/1 SYR4 2016
69 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,4,5-TP2,4-D4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalAsbestosAtrazineBenzeneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCopperCyanideCadmiumCarbon TetrachlorideChromiumDichloromethaneDalaponDinosebEthylene DibromideEndothallEthylbenzeneHfpo-DaLassoLeadMercuryNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaNitritePfbaPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneThallium, TotalTolueneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneLithiumO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
DOMINGUEZ, DARIO
Phone
559-562-7102
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Lindsay, City of

Is Lindsay, City of tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 24 contaminants in Lindsay, City of's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Lindsay, City of's water?

EPA monitoring detected TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Bromoform, Dibromochloromethane, Dibromoacetic Acid, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Lindsay, City of serve?

Lindsay, City of reports serving 12,659 people in California, per its EPA record.

Has Lindsay, City of had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 183 violations on file for Lindsay, City of, of which 175 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.