Tap WaterIndex

← California

Tap water quality report

Breese Subdivision 2

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 45 contaminants and detected 2. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

45
contaminants tested
2
detected
75
people served
2
health-based violations
California rankingsLead in CaliforniaPFAS in California
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Private
Counties served
Tehama

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

2
health-based violations
17
violations on file
2
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
TT Health-based Unaddressed 2024-10-17
MCL Health-based Resolved 2014-11-01 → 2014-11-30
RPT Monitoring Unaddressed 2024-10-17
MR Monitoring Resolved 2021-10-01
MR Monitoring Resolved 2021-10-01
MR Monitoring Resolved 1993-07-01 → 2000-03-01
Other Monitoring Archived 1984-07-01 → 1984-07-31
Other Monitoring Archived 1984-06-01 → 1984-06-30
Other Monitoring Archived 1983-07-01 → 1983-07-31
Other Monitoring Archived 1983-05-01 → 1983-05-31

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Nitrate
6044.17 µg/L 60%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 6260.2 µg/L
24/24 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.00093 mg/L 6.2%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
 3/3 LCR 2024
43 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane2,4-DAntimony, TotalArsenicBariumBenzeneBeryllium, TotalBromodichloromethaneBromoformChlorobenzeneCopperCadmiumCarbon TetrachlorideChloroformChromiumDichloromethaneDibromochloromethaneEthylbenzeneFluorideGlyphosateLeadMercuryNitriteSeleniumSimazineStyreneTTHMTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
WALKER, AUTUMN
Phone
530-209-2748
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Breese Subdivision 2

Is Breese Subdivision 2 tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 2 contaminants in Breese Subdivision 2's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Breese Subdivision 2's water?

EPA monitoring detected Nitrate, Lead. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Breese Subdivision 2 serve?

Breese Subdivision 2 reports serving 75 people in California, per its EPA record.

Has Breese Subdivision 2 had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 17 violations on file for Breese Subdivision 2, of which 2 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 2 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.