Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 1993-04-01 → 1993-04-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 1993-04-01 → 1993-04-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 1992-11-01 → 1992-11-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 1992-11-01 → 1992-11-30 |
| Other | Monitoring | Archived | 1985-08-01 → 1985-08-31 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bromodichloromethane | 31.795 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 40 µg/L | 58/58 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 50.725 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 73.8 µg/L | 58/58 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 121.5 µg/L 152% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 157 µg/L | 58/58 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 41.6 µg/L 69% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 51 µg/L | 57/58 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 13.35 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 39 µg/L | 54/58 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 50.485 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 64.9 µg/L | 50/58 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 23 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 30 µg/L | 47/58 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0 mg/L 0% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 38/38 | LCR | 2025 |
| Bromoform | 36.185 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 37.1 µg/L | 28/58 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 11.8 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 15 µg/L | 25/58 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 3 µg/L No EPA limit set | 16/58 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 5.3 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 6 µg/L | 15/58 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
30 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about San Joaquin County - Lincoln Village
Is San Joaquin County - Lincoln Village tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 12 contaminants in San Joaquin County - Lincoln Village's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in San Joaquin County - Lincoln Village's water?
EPA monitoring detected Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Trichloroacetic Acid, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does San Joaquin County - Lincoln Village serve?
San Joaquin County - Lincoln Village reports serving 5,841 people in California, per its EPA record.
Has San Joaquin County - Lincoln Village had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 5 violations on file for San Joaquin County - Lincoln Village, of which 4 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.