← California

Tap water quality report

Padre Dam Mwd

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 42 contaminants and detected 14. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

42
contaminants tested
14
detected
93,980
people served
3
health-based violations
Water source
SWP
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
San Diego

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

3
health-based violations
3
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 1995-03-01 → 1995-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 1995-03-01 → 1995-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 1995-03-01 → 1995-03-31

PFAS detected

PFAS are industrial “forever chemicals”. These are the EPA's latest nationwide test results (2023–2025).
ContaminantMaxDetection ratePeriod
Pfba 0.0058 µg/L 1/8 2023

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
TTHM
47.5 µg/L 59%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 68 µg/L
246/248 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane
13 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 20 µg/L
244/248 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
18 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 30 µg/L
244/248 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
11 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 20 µg/L
242/248 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromoform
9.52 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 14 µg/L
239/248 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
10 µg/L 17%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 15 µg/L
189/248 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
5.2 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 7.9 µg/L
188/248 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
3.1 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.1 µg/L
172/248 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
3.67 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.4 µg/L
147/248 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0011 mg/L 7.3%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
30/30 LCR 2025
Lithium
47 µg/L
No EPA limit set
7/8 UCMR-5 2023
Monobromoacetic Acid
3.945 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4 µg/L
2/248 SYR4 2012–2019
Monochloroacetic Acid
7.4 µg/L
No EPA limit set
1/248 SYR4 2012–2019
28 contaminants tested, none detected
11Cl-PF3OUdS4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaHfpo-DaNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaPFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpeaPfpesPftaPftrdaPfuna

Utility contact

Contact
SWANSON, KYLE
Phone
619-258-4673
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Padre Dam Mwd

Is Padre Dam Mwd tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 14 contaminants in Padre Dam Mwd's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Padre Dam Mwd's water?

EPA monitoring detected TTHM, Bromodichloromethane, Dibromochloromethane, Chloroform, Bromoform, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Padre Dam Mwd serve?

Padre Dam Mwd reports serving 93,980 people in California, per its EPA record.

Has Padre Dam Mwd had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 3 violations on file for Padre Dam Mwd, of which 3 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.