← California

Tap water quality report

Usmc - 29 Palms

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 111 contaminants and detected 17. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

111
contaminants tested
17
detected
16,067
people served
5
health-based violations
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Federal government
Counties served
San Bernardino

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

5
health-based violations
9
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 2008-03-01 → 2008-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2008-03-01 → 2008-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2004-05-01 → 2004-05-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2000-05-01 → 2000-05-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2000-05-01 → 2000-05-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2014-03-01
MR Monitoring Resolved 2014-03-01
MR Monitoring Resolved 2009-09-01 → 2009-09-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2009-09-01 → 2009-09-30

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Arsenic
7.22 µg/L 72%
of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
worst single sample: 9.3 µg/L
417/506 SYR4 2012–2019
Nitrate
1531.28 µg/L 15%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 2500 µg/L
184/184 SYR4 2012–2019
Fluoride
920 µg/L 23%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 1000 µg/L
51/51 SYR4 2012–2019
Chromium
21.85 µg/L 22%
of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
worst single sample: 22 µg/L
44/51 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
24 µg/L 30%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
38/38 SYR4 2014–2019
Bromoform
16.4 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 18 µg/L
37/38 SYR4 2014–2019
Dibromochloromethane
5.465 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 6.2 µg/L
28/38 SYR4 2014–2019
Lead
0.0200 mg/L 133%
above the EPA limit of 0.0150 mg/L
26/26 LCR 2024
Bromodichloromethane
1.69 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.8 µg/L
12/38 SYR4 2014–2019
Barium
43.5 µg/L 2.2%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 47 µg/L
11/51 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
2.43 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.5 µg/L
8/40 SYR4 2014–2019
Copper
234 µg/L 18%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 240 µg/L
3/30 SYR4 2012–2018
Lead
19.6 µg/L 131%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 20 µg/L
3/30 SYR4 2012–2018
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
3.47 µg/L 5.8%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 3.6 µg/L
3/40 SYR4 2014–2019
Bromate
0.0088 µg/L 0.1%
of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
worst single sample: 0.0090 µg/L
2/7 SYR4 2014–2016
Asbestos
0.1900 MFL 2.7%
of the EPA limit 7 MFL
1/48 SYR4 2012–2019
Monobromoacetic Acid
1 µg/L
No EPA limit set
1/40 SYR4 2014–2019
94 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,3,7,8-TCDD2,4,5-TP2,4-D4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChloriteChloroformDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDichloroacetic AcidDinosebDiquatEthylene DibromideEndothallEndrinEthylbenzeneGlyphosateHexachlorobenzeneHfpo-DaHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorMonochloroacetic AcidNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaNitriteOxamylPfbaPFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpeaPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTotal Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB)ToxapheneTrichloroacetic AcidTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneLithiumO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
PACKARD, NATALIE
Phone
760-830-7883
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Usmc - 29 Palms

Is Usmc - 29 Palms tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 17 contaminants in Usmc - 29 Palms's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Usmc - 29 Palms's water?

EPA monitoring detected Arsenic, Nitrate, Fluoride, Chromium, TTHM, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Usmc - 29 Palms serve?

Usmc - 29 Palms reports serving 16,067 people in California, per its EPA record.

Has Usmc - 29 Palms had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 9 violations on file for Usmc - 29 Palms, of which 5 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.