Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2024-01-01 → 2024-03-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2024-01-01 → 2024-03-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2024-01-01 → 2024-03-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2024-01-01 → 2024-03-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2023-10-01 → 2023-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2023-10-01 → 2023-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2023-10-01 → 2023-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2023-10-01 → 2023-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2016-01-01 → 2016-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2016-01-01 → 2016-12-31 |
PFAS detected
| Contaminant | Max | Detection rate | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| PFHXS | 0.0955 µg/L | 8/21 | 2025 |
| Pfhxa | 0.0190 µg/L | 7/21 | 2025 |
| Pfpea | 0.0144 µg/L | 7/21 | 2025 |
| PFOS | 0.2365 µg/L | 6/21 | 2025 |
| PFBS | 0.0117 µg/L | 4/21 | 2025 |
| Pfhpa | 0.0128 µg/L | 4/21 | 2025 |
| PFOA | 0.0159 µg/L | 4/21 | 2025 |
| Pfpes | 0.0108 µg/L | 2/21 | 2025 |
| Pfba | 0.0056 µg/L | 1/21 | 2025 |
| Pfhps | 0.0055 µg/L | 1/21 | 2025 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Combined Uranium | 84.93 µg/L 283% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 30 µg/L
worst single sample: 92.38 µg/L | 141/372 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Nitrate | 1514.2 µg/L 15% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 1700 µg/L | 72/144 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 42.845 µg/L 54% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 57.8 µg/L | 44/44 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 4.4 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.2 µg/L | 41/44 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 12.8 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 14.1 µg/L | 41/44 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Bromoform | 27.12 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 37.9 µg/L | 37/44 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 5.975 µg/L 10% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 6.6 µg/L | 34/44 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Chloroform | 5.2 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 7.2 µg/L | 33/44 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 6.025 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 6.6 µg/L | 32/44 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0081 mg/L 54% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 32/32 | LCR | 2025 |
| Lithium | 106 µg/L No EPA limit set | 17/21 | UCMR-5 | 2025 |
| Nitrate-Nitrite | 952000 µg/L 9520% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 980000 µg/L | 8/19 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Fluoride | 185 µg/L 4.6% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 200 µg/L | 7/22 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 1.08 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.1 µg/L | 5/44 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Arsenic | 9.56 µg/L 96% of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
worst single sample: 9.6 µg/L | 2/22 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloromethane | 0.9600 µg/L 19% of the EPA limit 5 µg/L | 1/18 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
84 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Running Springs Water District
Is Running Springs Water District tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 26 contaminants in Running Springs Water District's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Running Springs Water District's water?
EPA monitoring detected Combined Uranium, Nitrate, TTHM, Bromodichloromethane, Dibromochloromethane, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Running Springs Water District serve?
Running Springs Water District reports serving 5,268 people in California, per its EPA record.
Has Running Springs Water District had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 10 violations on file for Running Springs Water District, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.