← California

Tap water quality report

Running Springs Water District

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 110 contaminants and detected 26. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

110
contaminants tested
26
detected
5,268
people served
0
health-based violations
Water source
SWP
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
San Bernardino

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

0
health-based violations
10
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MR Monitoring Resolved 2024-01-01 → 2024-03-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2024-01-01 → 2024-03-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2024-01-01 → 2024-03-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2024-01-01 → 2024-03-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2023-10-01 → 2023-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2023-10-01 → 2023-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2023-10-01 → 2023-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2023-10-01 → 2023-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2016-01-01 → 2016-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2016-01-01 → 2016-12-31

PFAS detected

PFAS are industrial “forever chemicals”. These are the EPA's latest nationwide test results (2023–2025).
ContaminantMaxDetection ratePeriod
PFHXS 0.0955 µg/L 8/21 2025
Pfhxa 0.0190 µg/L 7/21 2025
Pfpea 0.0144 µg/L 7/21 2025
PFOS 0.2365 µg/L 6/21 2025
PFBS 0.0117 µg/L 4/21 2025
Pfhpa 0.0128 µg/L 4/21 2025
PFOA 0.0159 µg/L 4/21 2025
Pfpes 0.0108 µg/L 2/21 2025
Pfba 0.0056 µg/L 1/21 2025
Pfhps 0.0055 µg/L 1/21 2025

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Combined Uranium
84.93 µg/L 283%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 30 µg/L
worst single sample: 92.38 µg/L
141/372 SYR4 2012–2019
Nitrate
1514.2 µg/L 15%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 1700 µg/L
72/144 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
42.845 µg/L 54%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 57.8 µg/L
44/44 SYR4 2013–2019
Bromodichloromethane
4.4 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.2 µg/L
41/44 SYR4 2013–2019
Dibromochloromethane
12.8 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 14.1 µg/L
41/44 SYR4 2013–2019
Bromoform
27.12 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 37.9 µg/L
37/44 SYR4 2013–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
5.975 µg/L 10%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 6.6 µg/L
34/44 SYR4 2013–2019
Chloroform
5.2 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 7.2 µg/L
33/44 SYR4 2013–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
6.025 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 6.6 µg/L
32/44 SYR4 2013–2019
Lead
0.0081 mg/L 54%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
32/32 LCR 2025
Lithium
106 µg/L
No EPA limit set
17/21 UCMR-5 2025
Nitrate-Nitrite
952000 µg/L 9520%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 980000 µg/L
8/19 SYR4 2013–2019
Fluoride
185 µg/L 4.6%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 200 µg/L
7/22 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
1.08 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.1 µg/L
5/44 SYR4 2013–2019
Arsenic
9.56 µg/L 96%
of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
worst single sample: 9.6 µg/L
2/22 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloromethane
0.9600 µg/L 19%
of the EPA limit 5 µg/L
1/18 SYR4 2012–2018
84 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,3,7,8-TCDD2,4,5-TP2,4-D4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalAtrazineBhc-GammaBariumBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCopperCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChromiumDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDinosebDiquatEthylene DibromideEndothallEndrinEthylbenzeneGlyphosateHexachlorobenzeneHfpo-DaHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoLeadMercuryMethoxychlorMonobromoacetic AcidMonochloroacetic AcidNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaNitriteOxamylPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPftaPftrdaPfunaPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTotal Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB)ToxapheneTrichloroacetic AcidTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
CROWDER, AMIE
Phone
909-867-2766
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Running Springs Water District

Is Running Springs Water District tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 26 contaminants in Running Springs Water District's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Running Springs Water District's water?

EPA monitoring detected Combined Uranium, Nitrate, TTHM, Bromodichloromethane, Dibromochloromethane, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Running Springs Water District serve?

Running Springs Water District reports serving 5,268 people in California, per its EPA record.

Has Running Springs Water District had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 10 violations on file for Running Springs Water District, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.