Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
1
health-based violations
11
violations on file
0
still open
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 1999-11-01 → 1999-11-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Archived | 2014-10-01 → 2014-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Archived | 2014-10-01 → 2014-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Archived | 2014-07-01 → 2014-09-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Archived | 2014-07-01 → 2014-09-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Archived | 2014-04-01 → 2014-06-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Archived | 2014-04-01 → 2014-06-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2014-01-01 → 2014-03-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2014-01-01 → 2014-03-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2014-01-01 → 2014-03-31 |
Other contaminants detected
Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is
well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the
limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there
means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a
running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this
system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a
violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it
is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arsenic | 19.25 µg/L 193% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 10 µg/L
worst single sample: 27 µg/L | 1976/2571 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Nitrate | 2260 µg/L 23% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 2712 µg/L | 474/564 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Fluoride | 1080 µg/L 27% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 1900 µg/L | 325/325 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chromium | 12 µg/L 12% of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
worst single sample: 20 µg/L | 174/275 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 15.05 µg/L 19% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 25 µg/L | 127/150 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromoform | 5.33 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 7.3 µg/L | 115/150 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 4.3 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 8.5 µg/L | 115/150 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 3.7 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 6.1 µg/L | 90/150 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Nitrate-Nitrite | 2500 µg/L 25% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 540000 µg/L | 44/62 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 8.43 µg/L 14% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 12 µg/L | 30/144 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 2.8 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.7 µg/L | 29/150 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0 mg/L 0% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 23/23 | LCR | 2024 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 9.72 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 12 µg/L | 20/144 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 1.74 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.9 µg/L | 17/144 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Barium | 60.4 µg/L 3% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 73 µg/L | 15/275 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 20.25 µg/L 135% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 23 µg/L | 6/272 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 1.36 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.4 µg/L | 5/144 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Ethylbenzene | 0.8860 µg/L 0.1% of the EPA limit 700 µg/L
worst single sample: 0.8900 µg/L | 5/54 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Xylenes, Total | 4.76 µg/L 0% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 4.8 µg/L | 5/54 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lithium | 16.5 µg/L No EPA limit set | 5/23 | UCMR-5 | 2024 |
| Copper | 2498 µg/L 192% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 2900 µg/L | 4/279 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 1.685 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.7 µg/L | 4/144 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Combined Uranium | 15.645 µg/L 52% of the EPA limit 30 µg/L | 1/1 | SYR4 | 2013 |
87 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,3,7,8-TCDD2,4,5-TP2,4-D4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDinosebDiquatEthylene DibromideEndothallEndrinGlyphosateHexachlorobenzeneHfpo-DaHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaNitriteOxamylPfbaPFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpeaPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTotal Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB)ToxapheneTrichloroacetic AcidTrichloroethyleneVinyl Chloridecis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Victorville Water District
Is Victorville Water District tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 23 contaminants in Victorville Water District's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Victorville Water District's water?
EPA monitoring detected Arsenic, Nitrate, Fluoride, Chromium, TTHM, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Victorville Water District serve?
Victorville Water District reports serving 135,983 people in California, per its EPA record.
Has Victorville Water District had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 11 violations on file for Victorville Water District, of which 1 is health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.