← California

Tap water quality report

Ontario Municipal Utilities Company

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 110 contaminants and detected 27. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

110
contaminants tested
27
detected
185,010
people served
4
health-based violations
Water source
SWP
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
San Bernardino

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

4
health-based violations
4
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
TT Health-based Resolved 1993-06-01 → 1993-06-30
TT Health-based Resolved 1993-06-01 → 1993-06-30
TT Health-based Resolved 1993-06-01 → 1993-06-30
TT Health-based Resolved 1993-06-01 → 1993-06-30

PFAS detected

PFAS are industrial “forever chemicals”. These are the EPA's latest nationwide test results (2023–2025).
ContaminantMaxDetection ratePeriod
Pfba 0.0064 µg/L 2/36 2024
Pfpea 0.0067 µg/L 2/36 2024
Pfhxa 0.0071 µg/L 1/36 2024
PFHXS 0.0042 µg/L 1/36 2024
PFOA 0.0300 µg/L 1/36 2024
PFOS 0.0052 µg/L 1/36 2024

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Nitrate
12000 µg/L 120%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 14000 µg/L
1814/1956 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
71.5 µg/L 89%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 77 µg/L
171/201 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
15 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 30 µg/L
168/214 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane
20.15 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 23 µg/L
158/214 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
25 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 28 µg/L
158/214 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromoform
27.5 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 29 µg/L
151/214 SYR4 2012–2019
1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE
0.1200 µg/L 60%
of the EPA limit 0.2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 0.1600 µg/L
135/186 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
31.5 µg/L 53%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 43 µg/L
116/201 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
10.805 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 13 µg/L
104/201 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
4.205 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.6 µg/L
100/201 SYR4 2012–2019
Fluoride
400 µg/L 10%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 500 µg/L
92/93 SYR4 2012–2019
Chromium
7.45 µg/L 7.5%
of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
worst single sample: 8.8 µg/L
86/87 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
5.405 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 7.8 µg/L
80/201 SYR4 2012–2019
Monobromoacetic Acid
7.16 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 7.8 µg/L
69/201 SYR4 2012–2019
Monochloroacetic Acid
27 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 31 µg/L
36/201 SYR4 2012–2019
Barium
139.5 µg/L 7%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 140 µg/L
22/87 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.00060 mg/L 4%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
21/21 LCR 2024
Nitrite
4525 µg/L 453%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 1000 µg/L
worst single sample: 4900 µg/L
16/87 SYR4 2012–2019
Nitrate-Nitrite
9840 µg/L 98%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 12000 µg/L
13/13 SYR4 2017
Arsenic
2.39 µg/L 24%
of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
worst single sample: 2.4 µg/L
3/87 SYR4 2012–2019
Ethylene Dibromide
0.0210 µg/L 42%
of the EPA limit 0.0500 µg/L
1/127 SYR4 2012–2019
83 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,3,7,8-TCDD2,4,5-TP2,4-D4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalAsbestosAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCopperCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDinosebDiquatEndothallEndrinEthylbenzeneGlyphosateHexachlorobenzeneHfpo-DaHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoLeadMercuryMethoxychlorNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaOxamylPFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTotal Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB)ToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneLithiumO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
BURTON, SCOTT
Phone
909-395-2682
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Ontario Municipal Utilities Company

Is Ontario Municipal Utilities Company tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 27 contaminants in Ontario Municipal Utilities Company's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Ontario Municipal Utilities Company's water?

EPA monitoring detected Nitrate, TTHM, Chloroform, Bromodichloromethane, Dibromochloromethane, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Ontario Municipal Utilities Company serve?

Ontario Municipal Utilities Company reports serving 185,010 people in California, per its EPA record.

Has Ontario Municipal Utilities Company had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 4 violations on file for Ontario Municipal Utilities Company, of which 4 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.