Tap WaterIndex

← California

Tap water quality report

Sbdno County Service Area 70 Cedar Glen

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 80 contaminants and detected 15. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

80
contaminants tested
15
detected
1,240
people served
10
health-based violations
California rankingsLead in CaliforniaPFAS in California
Water source
SWP
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
San Bernardino

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

10
health-based violations
24
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
TT Health-based Resolved 2012-10-20
TT Health-based Resolved 2012-10-20
MCL Health-based Resolved 2002-01-01 → 2002-01-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2002-01-01 → 2002-01-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2001-12-01 → 2001-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2001-12-01 → 2001-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 1998-06-01 → 1998-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 1998-06-01 → 1998-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 1992-10-01 → 1992-10-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 1992-10-01 → 1992-10-31

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Lead
0.0 mg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
 39/39 LCR 2025
Bromodichloromethane
13.475 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 14.5 µg/L
38/38 SYR4 2015–2019
TTHM
79.715 µg/L 100%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 114.8 µg/L
38/38 SYR4 2015–2019
Dibromochloromethane
22.78 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 31.7 µg/L
37/38 SYR4 2015–2019
Chloroform
17.115 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 23.5 µg/L
34/38 SYR4 2015–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
11.24 µg/L 19%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 12.4 µg/L
34/38 SYR4 2015–2019
Bromoform
38.92 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 62.1 µg/L
29/38 SYR4 2015–2019
Nitrate
1017 µg/L 10%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
 24/24 SYR4 2012–2018
Dibromoacetic Acid
7.58 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 7.7 µg/L
22/38 SYR4 2015–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
7.625 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 8.6 µg/L
22/38 SYR4 2015–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
6.195 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 6.8 µg/L
12/38 SYR4 2015–2019
Nitrate-Nitrite
1000000 µg/L 10000%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 10000 µg/L
 4/4 SYR4 2013–2017
Fluoride
182 µg/L 4.6%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 190 µg/L
3/4 SYR4 2013–2017
Combined Uranium
4.00065 µg/L 13%
of the EPA limit 30 µg/L
worst single sample: 4.023 µg/L
2/2 SYR4 2013–2019
Monobromoacetic Acid
1.3 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 1/38 SYR4 2015–2019
65 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane2,3,7,8-TCDD2,4,5-TP2,4-DAntimony, TotalArsenicAtrazineBhc-GammaBariumBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCopperCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChromiumDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDinosebDiquatEthylene DibromideEndothallEndrinEthylbenzeneGlyphosateHexachlorobenzeneHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoLeadMercuryMethoxychlorMonochloroacetic AcidNitriteOxamylPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTotal Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB)ToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
SNYDER, GREGORY
Phone
760-955-9885
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Sbdno County Service Area 70 Cedar Glen

Is Sbdno County Service Area 70 Cedar Glen tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 15 contaminants in Sbdno County Service Area 70 Cedar Glen's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Sbdno County Service Area 70 Cedar Glen's water?

EPA monitoring detected Lead, Bromodichloromethane, TTHM, Dibromochloromethane, Chloroform, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Sbdno County Service Area 70 Cedar Glen serve?

Sbdno County Service Area 70 Cedar Glen reports serving 1,240 people in California, per its EPA record.

Has Sbdno County Service Area 70 Cedar Glen had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 24 violations on file for Sbdno County Service Area 70 Cedar Glen, of which 10 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.