Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 1987-06-01 → 1987-06-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 1987-06-01 → 1987-06-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 1987-06-01 → 1987-06-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 1987-06-01 → 1987-06-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 1987-05-01 → 1987-05-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 1987-05-01 → 1987-05-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 1987-05-01 → 1987-05-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 1987-05-01 → 1987-05-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 1987-04-01 → 1987-04-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 1987-04-01 → 1987-04-30 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nitrate | 8588 µg/L 86% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 10622 µg/L | 2904/3280 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Arsenic | 9.2 µg/L 92% of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
worst single sample: 19 µg/L | 573/971 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 65.18 µg/L 81% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 95.6 µg/L | 287/383 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 18.025 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 33 µg/L | 276/383 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 19.39 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 25.8 µg/L | 252/383 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 23.575 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 36.1 µg/L | 242/383 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 16.04 µg/L 27% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 19 µg/L | 225/376 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 6.675 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 11.8 µg/L | 206/376 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromoform | 14.48 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 31.7 µg/L | 154/383 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 8.24 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 10.6 µg/L | 145/376 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Fluoride | 410 µg/L 10% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 590 µg/L | 144/148 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 4.815 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 6.4 µg/L | 118/376 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Tetrachloroethylene | 1.25 µg/L 25% of the EPA limit 5 µg/L
worst single sample: 2 µg/L | 56/201 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Nitrate-Nitrite | 452000 µg/L 4520% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 780000 µg/L | 33/42 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Combined Uranium | 10.6535 µg/L 36% of the EPA limit 30 µg/L
worst single sample: 17.88 µg/L | 27/29 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0 mg/L 0% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 27/27 | LCR | 2024 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 1.29 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.4 µg/L | 12/376 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Copper | 83 µg/L 6.4% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L | 1/268 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Toluene | 1.7 µg/L 0.2% of the EPA limit 1000 µg/L | 1/78 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
92 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about West Valley Water District
Is West Valley Water District tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 19 contaminants in West Valley Water District's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in West Valley Water District's water?
EPA monitoring detected Nitrate, Arsenic, TTHM, Chloroform, Bromodichloromethane, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does West Valley Water District serve?
West Valley Water District reports serving 104,498 people in California, per its EPA record.
Has West Valley Water District had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 19 violations on file for West Valley Water District, of which 13 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.