Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MON | Monitoring | Resolved | 2020-01-01 → 2020-01-31 |
| MON | Monitoring | Resolved | 2020-01-01 → 2020-01-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2020-01-01 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2020-01-01 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bromodichloromethane | 10.48 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 14.4 µg/L | 89/89 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Chloroform | 19.72 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 24.6 µg/L | 89/89 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 10.54 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 12.5 µg/L | 89/89 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| TTHM | 37.56 µg/L 47% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 48.5 µg/L | 89/89 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 7.779 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 11.7 µg/L | 82/90 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 24.015 µg/L 40% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 114 µg/L | 82/90 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Bromoform | 7.6465 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 11.2 µg/L | 70/89 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 6.518 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 10.2 µg/L | 58/90 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 5.02 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.8 µg/L | 53/90 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0 mg/L 0% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 28/28 | LCR | 2024 |
| Fluoride | 520.5 µg/L 13% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 570 µg/L | 12/12 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Combined Uranium | 5.16732 µg/L 17% of the EPA limit 30 µg/L
worst single sample: 6.4815 µg/L | 10/12 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 88.44 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 107 µg/L | 9/90 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Arsenic | 2.34 µg/L 23% of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
worst single sample: 2.4 µg/L | 4/31 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lithium | 35.4811 µg/L No EPA limit set | 3/10 | UCMR-5 | 2025 |
| Combined Radium (-226 And -228) | 0.3615 pCi/L 7.2% of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
worst single sample: 0.3650 pCi/L | 2/2 | SYR4 | 2012 |
93 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about City of Seal Beach
Is City of Seal Beach tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 16 contaminants in City of Seal Beach's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in City of Seal Beach's water?
EPA monitoring detected Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dibromochloromethane, TTHM, Dichloroacetic Acid, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does City of Seal Beach serve?
City of Seal Beach reports serving 24,937 people in California, per its EPA record.
Has City of Seal Beach had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 4 violations on file for City of Seal Beach, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.