Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
0
health-based violations
8
violations on file
0
still open
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2012-07-01 → 2012-07-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2012-07-01 → 2012-07-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2012-06-01 → 2012-06-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2012-06-01 → 2012-06-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2012-01-01 → 2012-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2012-01-01 → 2012-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2007-04-01 → 2007-04-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2007-04-01 → 2007-04-30 |
Other contaminants detected
Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is
well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the
limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there
means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a
running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this
system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a
violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it
is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arsenic | 17.9 µg/L 179% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 10 µg/L
worst single sample: 30 µg/L | 103/155 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Nitrate | 2596.7 µg/L 26% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 4700 µg/L | 40/198 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chromium | 31.98 µg/L 32% of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
worst single sample: 96 µg/L | 33/37 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Barium | 93.8 µg/L 4.7% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 238 µg/L | 29/31 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Fluoride | 360 µg/L 9% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 600 µg/L | 29/31 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Nitrite | 485 µg/L 49% of the EPA limit 1000 µg/L
worst single sample: 6300 µg/L | 24/52 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0022 mg/L 15% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 22/22 | LCR | 2023 |
| Nitrate-Nitrite | 410000 µg/L 4100% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 500000 µg/L | 19/34 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Selenium | 4.1 µg/L 8.2% of the EPA limit 50 µg/L
worst single sample: 5 µg/L | 19/31 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Copper | 107 µg/L 8.2% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 111 µg/L | 17/31 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 28.85 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 36 µg/L | 12/29 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 67.1 µg/L 84% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 77 µg/L | 12/29 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 20 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 24 µg/L | 11/29 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 20.5 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 21 µg/L | 11/29 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 30.15 µg/L 50% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 36 µg/L | 10/12 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 12.1 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 13 µg/L | 10/12 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Bromoform | 24.6 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 25 µg/L | 9/29 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 4.2 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5 µg/L | 9/12 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 15.2 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 18 µg/L | 9/12 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Cadmium | 2 µg/L 40% of the EPA limit 5 µg/L | 6/31 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Combined Uranium | 2.96808 µg/L 9.9% of the EPA limit 30 µg/L
worst single sample: 3.3376 µg/L | 5/9 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloromethane | 7.76 µg/L 155% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 5 µg/L
worst single sample: 9.2 µg/L | 5/26 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 19.2 µg/L 128% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 20 µg/L | 3/31 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Antimony, Total | 1 µg/L 17% of the EPA limit 6 µg/L | 2/31 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Asbestos | 0.1980 MFL 2.8% of the EPA limit 7 MFL | 2/8 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Cyanide | 12.7 µg/L 6.4% of the EPA limit 200 µg/L
worst single sample: 13 µg/L | 2/27 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 1.95 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2 µg/L | 2/12 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Toluene | 69.38 µg/L 6.9% of the EPA limit 1000 µg/L
worst single sample: 73 µg/L | 2/25 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Diquat | 8.7 µg/L 43% of the EPA limit 20 µg/L | 1/16 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
67 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,4,5-TP2,4-D4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAtrazineBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDinosebEthylbenzeneHfpo-DaLassoMercuryMonochloroacetic AcidNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaOxamylPfbaPFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpeaPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaPentachlorophenolPicloramSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneLithiumO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Canada Woods Wc
Is Canada Woods Wc tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 29 contaminants in Canada Woods Wc's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Canada Woods Wc's water?
EPA monitoring detected Arsenic, Nitrate, Chromium, Barium, Fluoride, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Canada Woods Wc serve?
Canada Woods Wc reports serving 356 people in California, per its EPA record.
Has Canada Woods Wc had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 8 violations on file for Canada Woods Wc, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.