← California

Tap water quality report

Santa Lucia Preserve Ws

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 81 contaminants and detected 24. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

81
contaminants tested
24
detected
966
people served
6
health-based violations
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Private
Counties served
Monterey

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

6
health-based violations
30
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 2002-12-01 → 2002-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2002-12-01 → 2002-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2002-12-01 → 2002-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2002-11-01 → 2002-11-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2002-11-01 → 2002-11-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2002-11-01 → 2002-11-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2023-01-01 → 2023-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2023-01-01 → 2023-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2016-03-01 → 2016-03-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2016-03-01 → 2016-03-31

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Fluoride
3540 µg/L 89%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 5300 µg/L
197/201 SYR4 2012–2019
Nitrate
6100 µg/L 61%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 6200 µg/L
140/590 SYR4 2012–2019
Barium
213.15 µg/L 11%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 290 µg/L
70/101 SYR4 2012–2019
Chromium
14.6 µg/L 15%
of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
worst single sample: 36 µg/L
69/101 SYR4 2012–2019
Nitrite
520 µg/L 52%
of the EPA limit 1000 µg/L
worst single sample: 600 µg/L
57/122 SYR4 2012–2019
Cadmium
30.5 µg/L 610%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 5 µg/L
worst single sample: 51 µg/L
51/186 SYR4 2012–2019
Nitrate-Nitrite
710000 µg/L 7100%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 900000 µg/L
50/83 SYR4 2013–2019
Arsenic
6 µg/L 60%
of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
worst single sample: 12 µg/L
35/105 SYR4 2012–2019
Copper
18.9 µg/L 1.5%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 106 µg/L
23/101 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0013 mg/L 8.7%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
12/12 LCR 2026
Selenium
4.2 µg/L 8.4%
of the EPA limit 50 µg/L
worst single sample: 5.4 µg/L
11/101 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane
23.5 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 24 µg/L
6/47 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromoform
4.25 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5 µg/L
6/47 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
40.45 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 40.6 µg/L
6/47 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
4.25 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.5 µg/L
6/6 SYR4 2014–2019
Dibromochloromethane
9 µg/L
No EPA limit set
6/47 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
18 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 19 µg/L
6/6 SYR4 2014–2019
TTHM
72.25 µg/L 90%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 73 µg/L
6/47 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
30.75 µg/L 51%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 31 µg/L
6/6 SYR4 2014–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
8.75 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 9 µg/L
6/6 SYR4 2014–2019
Lead
1.1 µg/L 7.3%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
4/101 SYR4 2012–2019
Monobromoacetic Acid
1 µg/L
No EPA limit set
3/6 SYR4 2014–2019
Monochloroacetic Acid
2.95 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3 µg/L
3/6 SYR4 2014–2019
Toluene
23.7925 µg/L 2.4%
of the EPA limit 1000 µg/L
worst single sample: 25 µg/L
2/70 SYR4 2012–2019
57 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane2,3,7,8-TCDD2,4,5-TP2,4-DAntimony, TotalAsbestosAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCyanideCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneCombined UraniumDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDinosebDiquatEthylene DibromideEndothallEndrinEthylbenzeneGlyphosateHexachlorobenzeneHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorOxamylPentachlorophenolPicloramSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTotal Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB)ToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
DULA, AARON
Phone
831-620-6783
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Santa Lucia Preserve Ws

Is Santa Lucia Preserve Ws tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 24 contaminants in Santa Lucia Preserve Ws's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Santa Lucia Preserve Ws's water?

EPA monitoring detected Fluoride, Nitrate, Barium, Chromium, Nitrite, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Santa Lucia Preserve Ws serve?

Santa Lucia Preserve Ws reports serving 966 people in California, per its EPA record.

Has Santa Lucia Preserve Ws had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 30 violations on file for Santa Lucia Preserve Ws, of which 6 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.