Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| TT | Health-based | Unaddressed | 2024-10-17 |
| RPT | Monitoring | Unaddressed | 2024-10-17 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2003-08-01 → 2003-08-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2003-08-01 → 2003-08-31 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 15.27 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 18.3 µg/L | 59/59 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 39.16 µg/L 65% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 45 µg/L | 59/59 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 14.874 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 26.64 µg/L | 57/57 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 26 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 33.23 µg/L | 57/57 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 53.434 µg/L 67% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 81.66 µg/L | 57/57 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 27.975 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 32 µg/L | 56/59 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 17.16 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 30.56 µg/L | 54/57 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0 mg/L 0% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 21/21 | LCR | 2024 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 9.895 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 11 µg/L | 18/59 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromoform | 11.3145 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 11.78 µg/L | 8/57 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Fluoride | 150 µg/L 3.8% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L | 5/22 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 6.87 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 7.2 µg/L | 4/59 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Nitrate | 470 µg/L 4.7% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 4/60 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Thallium, Total | 1.4 µg/L 70% of the EPA limit 2 µg/L | 1/22 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
72 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Fort Bragg, City of
Is Fort Bragg, City of tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 14 contaminants in Fort Bragg, City of's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Fort Bragg, City of's water?
EPA monitoring detected Dichloroacetic Acid, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, TTHM, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Fort Bragg, City of serve?
Fort Bragg, City of reports serving 6,919 people in California, per its EPA record.
Has Fort Bragg, City of had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 4 violations on file for Fort Bragg, City of, of which 1 is health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 2 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.