← California

Tap water quality report

Suburban Water Systems-San Jose

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 82 contaminants and detected 29. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

82
contaminants tested
29
detected
168,843
people served
4
health-based violations
Water source
SWP
Ownership
Private
Counties served
Los Angeles

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

4
health-based violations
6
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
TT Health-based Resolved 1993-06-01 → 1995-11-30
TT Health-based Resolved 1993-06-01 → 1995-11-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 1992-12-01 → 1992-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 1992-12-01 → 1992-12-31
MON Monitoring Resolved 2022-04-01 → 2022-04-30
MON Monitoring Resolved 2022-04-01 → 2022-04-30

PFAS detected

PFAS are industrial “forever chemicals”. These are the EPA's latest nationwide test results (2023–2025).
ContaminantMaxDetection ratePeriod
Pfba 0.0062 µg/L 1/17 2025
PFBS 0.0036 µg/L 1/17 2025
Pfhxa 0.0033 µg/L 1/17 2025
Pfpea 0.0035 µg/L 1/17 2025

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Nitrate
5650 µg/L 56%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 12000 µg/L
1946/1948 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroethylene
7.7 µg/L 154%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 5 µg/L
worst single sample: 14 µg/L
498/937 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
50.75 µg/L 63%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 78 µg/L
246/259 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
14 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 24 µg/L
236/780 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane
16 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 25 µg/L
218/848 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
20.45 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 48 µg/L
212/854 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromoform
6.975 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 11 µg/L
196/810 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
18 µg/L 30%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 27 µg/L
187/248 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
11 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 16 µg/L
172/248 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
4.6 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 6.6 µg/L
163/248 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
7.5 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 10 µg/L
133/248 SYR4 2012–2019
Tetrachloroethylene
1.9 µg/L 38%
of the EPA limit 5 µg/L
worst single sample: 7.8 µg/L
69/937 SYR4 2012–2019
1,1-Dichloroethylene
3.7 µg/L 53%
of the EPA limit 7 µg/L
worst single sample: 16 µg/L
61/936 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0 mg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
38/38 LCR 2025
Fluoride
470 µg/L 12%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 490 µg/L
28/28 SYR4 2012–2019
Carbon Tetrachloride
0.6590 µg/L 13%
of the EPA limit 5 µg/L
worst single sample: 0.6700 µg/L
12/951 SYR4 2012–2019
Lithium
54 µg/L
No EPA limit set
6/17 UCMR-5 2025
Chromium
16.7 µg/L 17%
of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
worst single sample: 17 µg/L
4/21 SYR4 2012–2019
Combined Uranium
2.21265 µg/L 7.4%
of the EPA limit 30 µg/L
worst single sample: 2.235 µg/L
4/4 SYR4 2013–2016
Nitrate-Nitrite
5540 µg/L 55%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 5900 µg/L
4/4 SYR4 2016–2019
Chlorobenzene
1.329 µg/L 1.3%
of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
worst single sample: 1.4 µg/L
3/937 SYR4 2012–2019
Arsenic
2.49 µg/L 25%
of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
worst single sample: 2.5 µg/L
2/21 SYR4 2012–2019
Barium
150 µg/L 7.5%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
2/21 SYR4 2012–2019
cis-1,2-Dichloroethylene
1.2 µg/L 1.7%
of the EPA limit 70 µg/L
1/937 SYR4 2012–2019
trans-1,2-Dichloroethylene
1.3 µg/L 1.3%
of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
1/937 SYR4 2012–2019
53 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalCopperCyanideCadmiumDichloromethaneDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateEthylbenzeneHfpo-DaLeadMercuryMonobromoacetic AcidMonochloroacetic AcidNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaNitritePfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaSeleniumStyreneThallium, TotalTolueneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, TotalO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzene

Utility contact

Contact
DIMAGGIO, PAUL
Phone
626-543-2532
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Suburban Water Systems-San Jose

Is Suburban Water Systems-San Jose tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 29 contaminants in Suburban Water Systems-San Jose's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Suburban Water Systems-San Jose's water?

EPA monitoring detected Nitrate, Trichloroethylene, TTHM, Dibromochloromethane, Bromodichloromethane, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Suburban Water Systems-San Jose serve?

Suburban Water Systems-San Jose reports serving 168,843 people in California, per its EPA record.

Has Suburban Water Systems-San Jose had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 6 violations on file for Suburban Water Systems-San Jose, of which 4 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.